Extraction of Individual Tree Parameters by Using Terrestrial Laser Scanner Data in Hyricanian Forest

Authors
1 Ph.D. Student, Department of Forestry, Faculty of Natural Resources, Tarbiat Modares University, Noor, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Forestry, Faculty of Natural Resources, Tarbiat Modares University, Noor, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Faculty of Mining, Petroleum and Geophysics, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iran
4 Assistant Professor, Department of Mathematics, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Background: In this study for the first time terrestrial laser scanning survey was implemented on upland Hyrcanian forest, through which a and new method was applied to automatically extract DBH and tree position as a necessary step for height calculation and fitting the clustering as a circle.
Materials and Methods: Tree height extracted by fixing a cylinder around the trees center. The accuracies of these methods were investigated by field measurement. Among 4 shapes fitting algorithm, Monte Carlo had more suitable result to fitting circle in each height above the ground.
Results: Tree detection rates were 85% for Carpinus betulus and 87% for Diyospyrus lotus with respect to field measurement. R2 and RMSE for DBH measurement were 0.98, 2.06 cm for Carpinus betulus and 0.98, 1.26 cm for Diyospyrus lotus. Value of R2 and RMSE for height measurement were 0.96, 3.37 meters and 0.93, 3.02 meters for Carpinus betulus and Diyospyrus lotus, respectively.
Conclusions: The accuracy of DBH by TLS is very suitable, and about the height of trees we extracted underestimated value in comparison to field measurement and that we need to develop more effective algorithms in order to reach more accurate measurement of trees’ height in Hyrcanian forest.
Keywords

  1. Maas HG, Bienert A, Scheller S, Keane E. Automatic forest inventory parameter determination from terrestrial laser scanner data. Int J Remote Sens, 2008; 29(5): 1579-1593.

  2. Picard N, Henry M, Mortier F, Trotta C, Saint-André L. Using Bayesian model averaging to predict tree aboveground biomass in tropical moist forests. Forest Sci, 2012; 58(1): 15-23.

  3. Sumerling G. Lidar analysis in ArcGIS 10 for forestry applications. An Esri R White Paper. Redlands. CA, USA. 2011; p. 54.

  4. Van Leeuwen M, Nieuwenhuis M. Retrieval of forest structural parameters using LiDAR remote sensing. Eur J For Res. 2010; 129 (4): 749-770.

  5. White JC, Wulder MA, Vastaranta M, Coops NC, Pitt D, Woods M. The utility of image-based point clouds for forest inventory: A comparison with airborne laser scanning. Forests. 2013; 4(3): 518-536.

  6. Newnham GJ, Armston JD, Calders K, Disney MI, Lovell JL, Schaaf CB, Strahler AH, Danson FM. Terrestrial laser scanning for plot-scale forest measurement. Curr Forestry Rep. 2015; 1(4): 239-251.

  7. Hackenberg J, Morhart C, Sheppard J, Spiecker H, Disney M. Highly Accurate Tree Models Derived from Terrestrial Laser Scan Data: A Method Description. Forests. 2014; 5(5):1069-1105.

  8. Watt PJ, Donoghue DN. M. Measuring forest structure with terrestrial laser scanning. Int. J Remote Sens, 2005; 26(7): 1437-1446.

  9. Tansey K, Selmes N, Anstee A, Tate NJ, Denniss A. Estimating tree and stand variables in a Corsican Pine woodland from terrestrial laser scanner data. Int J Remote Sens, 2009; 30 (19): 5195-5209.

  10.  Murgoitio J, Shrestha R, Glenn N, Spaete L. Airborne LiDAR and terrestrial laser scanning derived vegetation obstruction factors for visibility models. T GIS, 2014; 18(1): 147-160.

  11.  Calders K, Newnham G, Burt A, Murphy S, Raumonen P, Herold M et al. Nondestructive estimates of above-ground biomass using terrestrial laser scanning. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2014; 6(2): 198-208.

  12.  Holmgren J, Nilsson MO. Estimation of tree height and stem volume on plots-using airborne laser scanning. Forest Sci, 2003; 49(3): 419-428.

  13.  Morsdorf F, Meier E, Kötz B, Itten KI, Dobbertin M, Allgöwer B. LIDAR-based geometric reconstruction of boreal type forest stands at single tree level for forest and wildland fire management. Remote Sens Environ. 2004; 92(3): 353-362.

  14.  Heurich M. Automatic recognition and measurement of single trees based on data from airborne laser scanning over the richly structured natural forests of the Bavarian Forest National Park. For Ecol Manage. 2008; 255 (7): 2416-2433.

  15.  Andersen H, Reutebuch S, McGaughey R. A rigorous assessment of tree height measurements obtained using airborne lidar and conventional field methods. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing. 2006; 32(5): 355-366.

  16.  Zawawi AA, Shiba M, Jemali NJN. Accuracy of LiDAR-based tree height estimation and crown recognition in a subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest in Okinawa, Japan. Forest Syst. 2015; 24(1): 002.

  17.  Lastools.Available: http://www.cs.unc.edu/ ~isenburg/lastools/. Accessed on: 04 Nov., 2014.

  18.  Koren M, Slančík M, Suchomel J, Dubina J. Use of terrestrial laser scanning to evaluate the spatial distribution of soil disturbance by skidding operations. Forest, 2015; 8(3): 386-393.

  19.  Kiraly G, Brolly G. Tree height estimation methods for terrestrial laser scanning in a forest reserve. Int. Arch. Photogram. Rem. Sens Spatial Inform Sci, 2007; 36(3/W52): 211-215.

  20.  Bienert A, Scheller S, Keane E, Mullooly G, Mohan F. Application of terrestrial laser scanners for the determination of forest inventory parameters. International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. 2006 Sep 25; 36(5).

  21.  Moskal LM, Zheng G. Retrieving forest inventory variables with Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) in urban heterogeneous forest. Int J Remote Sens. 2012; 4(1): 1-20.

  22.  Srinivasan S, Popescu SC, Eriksson M, Sheridan RD, Ku NW. Terrestrial laser scanning as an effective tool to retrieve tree level height, crown width, and stem diameter. Int J Remote Sens, 2015; 7(2): 1877-1896.

  23.  Zhong L, Cheng L, Xu H, Wu Y, Chen Y, Li M. Segmentation of individual trees from TLS and MLS Data. IEEE J. Sel. Topics Appl. Earth Observ. Int Remote Sens. 2016; 99: 1-14.