Amutha, R. and Porch Elvan, P. Estimation of surface runoff in malattar Sub-Watershed using SCSCN Method. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens., 2009; 37: 291-304.
B.J. Water management practices and SCS curve numbers of paddy fields equipped with surface drainage pipes, J. Hydrol., 110: 2012; 78-83.
Bhuyan, S.J., Mankin, K.R. and Koelliker. J.K. Watershed-scale AMC selection for hydrologic modeling. Trans ASAE., 2003; 46(2): 303-310.
Bronstert, A., Niehoff, D. and Burger, G. Effects of climate and land-use change on storm runoff generation: present knowledge and modeling capabilities. Hydrol. Process., 2002; 16: 509-529.
Carlesso, R., Spohr, R.B., Eltz, F.L.F. and Flores, C.H. Runoff estimation in southern Brazil based on Smith’s modified model and the Curve Number method. J. Agri. Water Manage., 2011; 98 (2011): 1020-1026.
Chow, V.T., Maidment, D.R. and Mays, L.W. Applied Hydrology. McGraw-Hill, NY. 1988. 572 P.
Croke, B.F.W., Meritt, W.S. and Jakeman, A.J. A dynamic model for predicting hydrologic response to land cover changes in gauged and ungauged catchments. J. Hydrol., 2004; 291; 115-131.
Deshmukh, S.D., Chaube, U.C., Hailu, A.E., Gudeta, D.A. and Kassa, M.T. Estimation and comparison of curve numbers based on dynamic land use land cover change, observed rainfall-runoff data and land slope, J. Hydrol., 2013; 492 (2013); 89-101.
Elhakeem, M. and Papanicolaou, A.N. Estimation of the runoff curve number via direct rainfall simulator measurements in the state of Iowa, USA, Water Resour. Manag., 2009; 23: 2455-2473.
El-Hames, A.S. An empirical method for peak discharge prediction in ungauged arid and semi-arid region catchments based on morphological parameters and SCS curve number. J. Hydrol., 2012; 456-457: 94-100.
Hawkins, R.H. Runoff curve number with varying site moisture. J. Irrigat. Drain Eng., 1978; 104 (4): 389-398.
Hawkins, R.H., Hjelmfelt, A.T.Jr. and Zevenbergen, A.W. Runoff probability, storm depth and curve numbers. J. Irrigat. Drain Eng., ASCE., 1985; 111(4): 330-340.
Hawkins, R.H., Jiang, R., Woodward, D.E., Hjelmfelt, A.T.Jr. and Mullem, V.J.A. Runoff curve number method: examination of the initial abstraction ratio, proceedings 2nd federal interagency Hydrologic Modeling Conference (CD), Las Vegas Nevada. 2002; 10 P.
Heaney, JP., Sample, D. and Wright, L. Geographical information systems. Decision support systems, and urban storm water management. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Edison, NJ. 2001; 127: 3(155): 155-161.
Hjelmfelt, A.T.Jr. Empirical investigation of curve number technique. J. Hydraul. Division. ASCE 106 (HY9), 1980; 1471-1476.
Hjelmfelt, A.T.Jr. Investigation of curve number procedure. J. Hydraul. Eng., ASCE., 1991; 117(6): 725-737.
Hope, A.S. and Schulze, R.E. Improved estimates of storm flow volume using the SCS CN method. In: singh VP (ed) Proc., int. symp. on rainfall–runoff modeling. J. Water Res. Pl., Littleton, CO, 1981; 419-428.
Isik, S., Kalin, L., Schoonover, J.E., Srivastava, P. and Lockaby, B.G. Modeling effects of changing land use/cover on daily streamflow: An artificial neural network and curve number based hybrid approach. J. Hydrol., 2012; 485: 103-112.
Jafari, M., Vafakhah, M., Abghari, H. and Tavasoli, A. Runoff coefficient forecasting using artificial neural network in neyshabur bar-arieh Watershed, Iran Natural Ecosystem J., 2012; 2(3): 85-97. (In Persian)
Jung, J.W., Yoon, K.S., Choi, D.H., Lim, S.S., Choi, W.J., Choi, S.M. and Lim, Water management practices and SCS curve numbers of paddy fields equipped with surface drainage pipes, J. Hydrol., 2012, 110(2): 78-83.
Kalin, L. and Hantush, M.M. An auxiliary method to reduce potential adverse impacts of projected land developments: sub watershed prioritization. J. Environ. Manage., 2009; 43(2): 311-325.
Kothyari, U.C. and Jain, S.K. Sediment yield estimation using GIS. J. Hydrol. Sci., 1997; 42(6): 833-843.
Lal, M., Mishra, S.K. and Pandey, A. Physical verification of the effect of land features and antecedent moisture on runoff curve number, Catena, 2015; 133 (2015): 318-327.
Lin, K., Lv, F., Chen, L., Singh, V.P., Zhang, Q. and Chen, X. Xinanjiang model combined with Curve Number to simulate the effect of land use change on environmental flow, J. Hydrol., 2014; 519: 3142-3152.
Lin, Y.P., Hong, N.M., Wu, P.J., Wu, C.F. and P.H. Verburg. Impact of land use change scenarios on hydrology and land use patterns in the Wu–Tu watershed in Northern Taiwan. Landsc. Urban Plann., 2007; 82: 111-126.
Liu, X. Z. and Li, J.Z. Application of SCS model in Estimation of Runoff from Small Watershed in Loess Plateau of China. Chinese Geogr. Sci., 2008; 18(3): 235-241.
McCuen, R.H. Hydrologic analysis and design, 3rd Ed. Prentice hall, Englewood cliffs. 2003; 859 P.
Mishra, S.K. and Singh, V.P. Soil conservation service curve number (SCS-CN) methodology. Kluwer, dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2003; 1132-1136.
Mishra, S.K., Jain, M.K., Pandey, R.P. and Singh, V.P. Catchment area-based evaluation of the AMC-dependent SCS-CN-based rainfall–runoff Models. J. Hydrol. Process., 2005; 19(14): 2701-2718.
Mishra, S.K., Jain, M.K., Suresh Babu, P., Venugopal, K. and Kaliappan, S. Comparison of AMC-dependent CN-conversion formulae. J. Water Res. Manage., 2008; 22: 1409-1420.
Neitsch, S.L., Arnold, J.G., Kiniry, J.R., Williams, J.R. and King, K.W. Soil and water assessment tool (SWAT): theoretical documentation, version 2000. Texas water resources institute, college station, TX, TWRI Report TR-191., 2002; 506 P.
Papanicolaou, A.N., Elhakeem, M., Krallis, G., Prakash, S. and Edinger, J. Sediment transport modeling review-current and future developments. J. Hydraul. Eng., 2008; 134(1): 1-14.
Patil, J.P., Sarangi, A., Singh, O.P., Singh, A.K. and Ahmad, A. Development of a GIS interface for estimation of runoff from Watersheds. J. Water Res. Manage., 2008; 22: 1221-1239.
Ponce, V.M. and Hawkins, R.H. Runoff curve number: Has it reached maturity? J. Hydraul. Eng., 1996; 1(1): 11-19.
Ponce, V.M. Engineering hydrology principles and practices. San Diego State University, San Diego. 1989; 573 P.
Sadeghi, S.H.R., Tavasoli, A. and Moradi, H.R. Simulation intra-change storm of runoff coefficient with use in factors rain for Neyshabur Bar Watershed, Iran, J. of Sci. and Watershed Manage. Eng., 2010; 4(10): 21-33. (In Persian)
Schulze, R.E. Modelling hydrological responses to land use and climatic change: a Southern African perspective. Roy. Swed. Acad. Sci., 2000; 29 (1): 12-22.
SCS. Hydrology. National engineering handbook, supplement a, section 4, chapter 10, soil conservation service, USDA, Washington, DC. 1956; 70 P.
SCS. Hydrology. national engineering handbook, supplement a, section 4, chapter 10, soil conservation service, USDA, Washington, DC. 1964; 75 P.
SCS. Hydrology. national engineering handbook, supplement a, section 4, chapter 10, soil conservation service, USDA, Washington, DC. 1971; 77 P.
SCS. Hydrology. national engineering handbook, supplement a, section 4, chapter 10, soil conservation service, USDA, Washington, DC. 1972; 77 P.
SCS. Hydrology. national engineering handbook, supplement a, section 4, chapter 10, soil conservation service, USDA, Washington, DC. 1985; 78P.
SCS. Hydrology. national engineering handbook, supplement a, section 4, chapter 10, soil conservation service, USDA, Washington, DC. 1993; 79 P.
Siriwardena, L., Finlayson, B.L. and McMahon, T.A. The impact of land use change on catchment hydrology in large catchments: the Comet River, Central Queensland, Australia. J. Hydrol., 2006; 326: 199-214.
Sobhani, G. A review of selected small Watershed design methods for possible adoption to iranian conditions. M.S. Thesis, Utah State University, Logan, UT. 1975.
Suresh Babu, P., Venugopal, K.S. and Kaliappan, S. Comparison of AMC-dependent CN-conversion Formulae. J. Water Res. Manage., 2008; 22: 1409-1420.
USDA., Urban hydrology for small Watersheds. Technical release, no 55 (TR-55). Soil Conservation Service, Washington, DC. 1986; 450 P.
Wu, T.H., Hall, J.A. and Bonta, J.V. Evaluation of runoff and erosion models. J. Irrigat Drainage Eng. 1993; 119(2): 364-382.
Xiao, B., IAO, Wang, Q.H., Fan, J., Han, F.P., and Q.H. Dai. Application of the SCS-CN model to runoff estimation in a small Watershed with high spatial heterogeneity, Pedosphere, 2011; 21(6): 738-749.