Farmer or Expert; A Comparison between Three Land Suitability Assessments for Upland Rice and Rubber in Phonexay District, Lao Pdr

Authors
J. F. Sánchez-Moreno 1
A. Farshad 1
P. Pilesjö 2
1 ITC, Enschede, The Netherlands
2 Associate Professor. Director GIS Centre. Lund University, Sweden.
Abstract
Around 80% of the population relies on agriculture, rice being the staple food. Topography urges farmers to cultivate upland rice. The Chinese interest in rubber latex has stimulated farmers to grow rubber, although the technical knowledge regarding tree management and latex processing is poor. A study was conducted in an area in Luang Prabang province to examine the suitability of upland rice and rubber. The major objective was to make a comparison within and between three suitability evaluation methods, two of which are expert-driven whereas the third one was executed by a group of farmers. For the fuzzy model different membership values were set and weighed using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) technique. According to the Boolean classification 88% of the study area is suitable for upland rice, and 85% is suitable for rubber. The fuzzy method yielded 89% suitable for upland rice and 88% suitable for rubber. Farmers came up with 37% suitable for upland rice and 14% suitable for rubber. Comparison is made between the different methods. A reasonable agreement between farmers’ suitability maps and the expert-based methods is obtained for the upland rice than for the rubber-based land utilization type (LUT). This can be attributed to the lack of know-how on the latter.
Keywords
Land Evaluation
Suitability
Fuzzy
Boolean
ALES
Burrough, P.A., Fuzzy Mathematical Methods for Soil Survey and Land Evaluation. J. Soil Sci., 1989; 40: 477-492.
Burrough, P.A., Natural objects with indeterminate boundaries. In: Burrough, P.A. & Frank, A.U. (Eds). London, Taylor & Francis. 1996.
Ceballos-Silva, A. and López-Blanco, J. Evaluating biophysical variables to identify suitable areas for oat in Central Mexico: a multi-criteria and GIS approach. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ., 2003; 95: 371-377.
Douangsavanh, L., Manivong, V., Polthanee, A., Katawatin, R. and Inoue, Y., Indigenous Knowledge on Soil Classification of Ethnic Groups in Luang Prabang Province of the Lao PDR. J. Mt. Sci., 2006; 3(3): 247-258.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). A framework for land evaluation. Soils Bulletin 32, 1976, 87 p.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Guidelines: land evaluation for rainfed agriculture. Soils Bulletin 52, 1983, 237 p.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Agro-ecological zoning guidelines. 1996, 78 p.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Participation in Practice: Lessons from the FAO People's Participation Programme. 1997, 44 p.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Unesco and ISRIC (Wageningen, The Netherlands). Soil Map of the World, revised legend. World Soil Resources Report No. 60, 1988, 119 p.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Land evaluation. Towards a revised framework. Land and Water Discussion paper No. 6, 2007.
Hall, G.B., Wang, F. and Subaryono, J., Comparison of Boolean and fuzzy classification methods in land suitability analysis by using geographical information systems. Environ. Plann. A, 1992; 24(4): 497-516.
Koreleski, K., Adaptations of the Storie index for land evaluation in Poland. Soil Survey and Land Evaluation 1988; 8: 23-29.
Mahanty, S., Fox, J., Nurse, N., Stephen, P. and McLees, L. Hanging in the Balance: Equity in Community-Based Natural Resource Management in Asia, Bangkok: RECOFTC (Regional Community Forestry Training Center for Asia and the Pacific); Honolulu: East-West Center. 2006; http://www.eastwestcenter.org/ fileadmin/stored/misc/HangingInBalance01FrontMatter.pdf.
McBratney A.B. and Odeh I.O.A., Application of fuzzy sets in soil science: Fuzzy logic, fuzzy measurements and fuzzy decisions. Geoderma, 1997; 77: 85-113.
Rae, S.G. and Burnham, C.P. Land evaluation. Monographs on soil survey, Oxford: Clarendon Press. viii, 1981; 239P.
National Agriculture & Forestry Research Institute NAFRI. Report on Household Diagnostic Survey in Phonexay District, Luangprabang Province. LSUAFRP Field Report No. 03. Vientiane. 2004.
National Agriculture & Forestry Research Institute NAFRI. Report on Rubber Suitability Zoning in the Central Development Zone, Na Mo District, Oudomsay Province. LSUAFRP Field Report No. 12. Vientiane, 2005.
Nilsson, E. and Svensson, A.K. Agro-Ecological Assessment of Phonxay District, Louang Phrabang Province, Lao PDR. A Minor Field Study. Geobiosphere Science Centre Physical Geography and Ecosystems Analysis. Lund, Sweden. 2006.
Nisar Ahamed, T.R., Gopal Rao, K., Murthy, J.S.R., GIS-based fuzzy membership model for crop-land suitability analysis. Agr. Syst., 2000; 63(2): 75-95.
Reshmidevi, T.V., Eldho, T.I. and Jana, R. A GIS-integrated fuzzy rule-based inference system for land suitability evaluation in agricultural watersheds. Agr. Syst., 2009; 101(1-2): 101-109.
Rossiter, D.G., Technical Note: Statistical methods for accuracy assessment of classified thematic maps. Enschede, the Netherlands. 2004. http://www.itc.nl/ personal/rossiter/pubs/list.html# pubs_m_R.
Rossiter, D.G., Land evaluation: towards a revised framework; Land and Water Discussion Paper 6, FAO, 2007, 107 p.
Rossiter, D.G. and Wambeke V. Automated Land Evaluation System: ALES version 4.65 user's manual. Ithaca, Cornell University, Department of Soil, Crop and Atmospheric Sciences, 1997, 280 p.
Saaty, T.L. The Analytical Hierarchy Process. McGraw Hill, New York. 1980, 287 p.
Saaty, T.L. and Vargas, L.G. Models, methods, concepts, and applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Kluwer Academic, Boston, 2001, 333 p.
Sanchez-Moreno, J.F. Applicability of Knowledge-Based and Fuzzy Theory-Oriented Approaches to Land Suitability for Upland Rice and Rubber as compared to the Farmers’ Perception: A Case Study of Lao PDR. ITC, Enschede, The Netherlands, 2007. http://www.itc.nl/ library/papers_2007/msc/gem/sanchez.pdf.
Schubert, P. Cultivation Potential in Hambantota District, Sri Lanka. A Minor Field Study. Geobiosphere Science Centre Physical Geography and Ecosystems Analysis. Lund, Sweden, 2004. .http://luma.gis.lu.se/thesis/ Schubert2004.pdf.
Sicat, R.S. and Carranza, E.J.M. Nidumolu, U.B., Fuzzy modeling of farmers’ knowledge for land suitability classification, Agr. Syst., 2005; 83: 49-75.
Son, N.T. and Shrestha, R.P. GIS-assisted land evaluation for agricultural development in Mekong delta, southern Vietnam.  J. Sus. Dev. Africa, 2008; 10(2): 875-895.
Sys, C., van Ranst, E. and Debaveye, J. Land evaluation: Part I. Principles in land evaluation and crop production calculations, Part II. Methods in land evaluation, Part III. Crop requirements. General Administration for Development Cooperation, Brussels, 1991.
Tang, H.J., Debavye, J., Ruan, D. and Van Ranst, E. Land suitability classification based on fuzzy sets theory. Pedologie, 1991; 41: 277-290.
United Nations Capital Development Fund UNCDF. Lao PDR- Fact Finding Mission Report, 2002. http://www.uncdf. org/english/countries/laos/local_
United Nations Development Programme UNDP. Human Development Report. Cultural liberty in today’s diverse world. New York, 2004, 285 p.
United Nations Development Programme UNDP. Human Development Report. Fighting climate change: Human solidarity in a divided world. P. Macmillan. New York. United Nations Development Programme, 2008, 400 p.
Verdoodt, A. and Van Ranst, E., Land Evaluation for Agricultural Production in the Tropics. A Two-Level Crop Growth Model for Annual Crops, Ghent University, Laboratory of Soil Science, 2003, 258 p.
Xue, Y.-J., Hu, Y.-M., Liu, S.-G., Yang, J.-F., Chen, Q.-C. and Bao, S.-T. Improving Land Resource Evaluation Using Fuzzy Neural Network Ensembles. Pedosphere, 2007; 17(4): 429-435.
Zadeh, L.A., Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 1965; 8: 338-353.
ECOPERSIA
Volume 1, Issue 3 - Serial Number 5
September 2013
Pages 235-260