The Influence of the Media on the Understanding of the Relationship Between Modern Man and the Environment: Semiotics of the Movie "So Far, So Close"

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
M. Niazi 1
M. Helali Sotoodeh 1
A. Afzali 2
Z. Goodarz 1
1 Department of Sociology, University of Kashan, Kashan, Iran
2 Department of Environment, Faculty of Natural Resources and Earth Sciences, University of Kashan, Kashan, Iran
10.22034/ECOPERSIA.13.1.1
Abstract
Aims: The environmental crisis in today's world is one of the biggest challenges facing modern man, which requires urgent attention. With the power of wide influence and in-depth analysis, the media can play an important role in raising awareness and shaping the public attitude and behavior about this crisis.. This research aims to represent the relationship between modern humans and the environment in cinema.

Materials & Methods: By reviewing the Iranian films related to the environment, the film “So Far, So Close" was examined as a case study. In this research, Roland Barthes' semiotics method has been used to analyze the complexity and depth of hidden meaning in the film.
Findings: Two types of relationship between humans and environment can be considered. In the first type, the relationship should be depicted through the display of scenes where humans are enchanted by technology and only look at nature as a source of profit and pleasure. In the second type, the relationship is through the display of scenes where humans understand the weaknesses of technology against the power of nature. Human salvation should be depicted in harmonious and sustainable interactions with nature. The film effectively shows the importance of the relationship with nature, while nature is represented as a source that gives meaning to his life.

Conclusion: Knowledge and technology, the two tools of modern human dominance, are powerless against the power of nature. Therefore, an effective relationship with environment can be salvific for both.
Keywords
media
human
environment
totalism
Roland Barthes
semiotics
Technology
Knowledge

Subjects

1. Abdullah, T.L. Climate Change in Jennifer Mills Dyschronia: An Eco-Social Critical Study. Journal of Namibian Studies: History Politics Culture. 2023; 33: 458-469.‏
2. Adorno T.W. Horkheimer M. Dialectic of Enlightenment (Vol. 15). New York and London: Verso; 1997.
3. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1991; 50(2): 179-211.
4. Alikhani Z., Gholami F. Documentaries and environmental justice: the analysis of the documentaries related to water crisis in Iran. Iranian Journal of Anthropological Research. 2021; 11(1), 121-150.‏
5. Barthes, R. Elements of Semiology. AnnetteLavers and Colin Smith. New York: Hill & Wang; 1968.
6. Barza S., Memari M. Movie genre preference and culture. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014; 98: 363-368. ‏
7. Beck U. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity (Vol. 17). London: SAGE Publications; 1992.
8. Benhabib S. The Critique of Instrumental Reason. In S. Žižek (Ed.), Mapping Ideology. New York and London: Verso; 1994.
9. Biro, A. Denaturalizing ecological politics: Alienation from nature from Rousseau to the Frankfurt School and beyond. University of Toronto Press; 2005.‏
10. Buell L. Ecocriticism: Some emerging trends. Qui Parle. 2011; 19(2): 87–115.
11. Chawla L., Cushing, D.F. Education for strategic environmental behavior. Environmental education research. 2007; 13(4): 437-452.
12. Miller C., Clarkson L., Ross D. The environmental crisis and the film First Reformed: Paths to paralysis and change. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis. 2022; 103(2): 395-412.
13. Dianiya V. Representation of social class in film (semiotic analysis of Roland Barthes film parasite). Profetik: Jurnal Komunikasi. 2020; 13(2): 212-224.
14. Downs A. Up and Down with Ecology-the Issue-Attention Cycle . Public Interest. 1972; 28: 38-50.
15. Eco, U. A Theory of Semiotics, Indiana; 1976.‏
16. Eom K., Ng S.T. The potential of religion for promoting sustainability: The role of stewardship. Topics in Cognitive Science. 2023; 15(3): 480-499.
17. Fernández Díaz, M. La crisis ambiental en cortometrajes animados: percepciones del profesorado de educación primaria en formación. Praxis & Saber. 2023; 14(38), 54-70.‏
18. Fiske, J. Pengantar Ilmu Komunikasi – Edisi Ketiga. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada; 2012.
19. George R., Sunitha V. Navigating the ecological self: A deep ecological analysis of self realization in the film AVATAR. Human Arenas. 2024.
20. Gol, J.R., George, R. Representing The Environment, London: Routledge; 2004.
21. Gold J., Revill G. Representing The Environment, London: Routledge; 2004.
22. Griffin J. Foundations of rhetoric within the semiosis of life. The American Journal of Semiotics. 2012; 28(4): 175-204.
23. Hall D.J. The Steward: A Biblical Symbol Come of Age. New York: Friendship Press; 1990.
24. Hansen A. Communication, media and environment: Towards reconnecting research on the production, content and social implications of environmental communication. International Communication Gazette. 2011; 73: 77.
25. Hillier, B. Structure, Transportation: Sciences of Urbanization and Science of the Artificial''; Bartlett Society Transition, Vol. 9. UCL Press, UK; 1973.
26. Hua, Y. The Dual alienation in Waste Tide. Comparative Literature Studies. 2020; 57(4): 670-685.
27. Jane, M.R., & Kencana, W.H. Representasi Kesetaraan Gender Pada Film Live-Action “Mulan” Produksi Disney (Analisis Semiotika Perspektif Roland Barthes). Jurnal Ikon Universitas Persada Indonesia. 2021; 26(1): 64- 82.
28. Jasrotia, A. The Value of Nature: A Holistic Perception. In Connected Accountabilities: Environmental Justice and Global Citizenship. Brill; 2009. ‏
29. Li Q., Wei W., Xiong N., Feng D., Ye X., Jiang, Y. Social media research, human behavior, and sustainable society. Sustainability. 2017; 9(3): 1-11.
30. Linda K. Understanding the Social Construction of Environmental Concern, Research in Human Ecology. Human Ecology Review. 2000; 4(2), 101–105.
31. Lolang E., Rais R., Oualeng A., Prayitno M. A. Analysis of Educational Messages in The Lion King Movie: Perspectives on Character Education and Environmental Conservation. Journal of Education. 2023; 2(2): 122–130.
32. MacDonald, S. Toward an eco-cinema. Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment; 2004.‏
33. Maidunoma Z., Falmatami K.S. Broadcast media in promoting environmental awareness: A study of Yobe State Broadcasting Cooperation Damaturu (YBC), Nigeria, KIU. Journal of Humanities. 2018; 3(1): 341-350.
34. Michael M. Reconnecting Culture, Technology and Nature; From Society to Heterogeneity, London: Routledge; 1999.
35. Naess, A. Self-realization: An ecological approach to being in the world. In G. Sessions (Ed.), Deep ecology for the twenty-frst century; 1995a
36. Naess, A. The deep ecology eight points revisited. In G. Sessions (Ed.), Deep ecology for the twentyfrst century ; 1995
37. Naess, A. Ecosophy T: Deep versus shallow ecology. Environmental ethics: Readings in theory and application; 2001.‏
38. Naqabi B., Hashempour P., Ghaffari A., Asefi M. Presenting a model to explain the holistic view of the relationship between man and nature in architecture by relying on cognitive mapping. Haft Hesar environmental studies. 2020; 10(36): 59-72.
39. Nasr S H. Religion and environmental crisis. Review. 1998; 4 (1-2), 90-98.
40. Nezakhti F., Derakhsheh Jalal. Decoding myth in symbolic systems. Cultural research letter; 2012.
41. Ng T.K. Buddhist and Christian visions of the environmental crisis on film. Buddhist-Christian Studies. 2019; 39(1): 315-316.
42. Nosratnejad F., Serajzadeh S.H. Dihol Mansour. Sociological explanation of environmental behavior (case study: Tehrani citizens). Sustainable Development of the Geographical Environment. 2019; 2(2): 33-52.
43. Okpadah, S.O. Engaging cinema in environmental crisis: A paradigm of documentary films of the Niger Delta. Colloquia Humanistica. 2022; 11: 1-22.
44. Poornananda D. Claims-makers and media frames of environmental. issues Department of Mass Communication and Journalism, Mangalore University, Mangalore, India; 2006.
45. Pop R.A., Săplăcan Z., Dabija D.C., Alt M.A. The impact of social media influencers on travel decisions: The role of trust in consumer decision journey. Current Issues in Tourism. 2022; 25 (5): 823-843.‏
46. Qalandarian I., Taqvai A.A., Kamiar M. A comparative study of the relationship between man and the environment in the thinking of sustainable development and Islamic thinking. Researches of Islamic architecture. 2015; 4(1): 62-78.
47. Qudosi Far S.H., Habib F., Shahbazi M. Impaled wisdom and the place of nature in the worldview and architecture of temples of different religions. Bagh Nazar. 2011; 9(20), 37-50.
48. Salehi S., Emamgholi L. Media, Culture and Environmental Behavior (Case Study: Citizens of Sanandaj). Sociology of Culture and Art. 2019; 1(1): 71-48.‏
49. Saurin, J. Global environmental degradation, modernity and environmental knowledge. Environmental Politics. 1993; 2(4), 46-64.
50. Stephan, M. Akyuz, D. Semiotics from a Social Constructivist Perspective. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 2021; 1-2.
51. Sarah, R. Representation of Feminism on the Character of Enola Holmes in the Enola Holmes Film: John Fiske's Semiotics Analysis. Universitas Sunan Gunung Jati. diakses pada tanggal; 2022.‏
52. Sekaranti, D.A., Kartikasari R. The Representation of Korean Women's Beauty in K-Natural White Brightening Body Wash Self-care Ads on Television Media: (Roland Barthes' Semiotic Analysis). JEMBA. 2023; 1 (1): 1-17.‏
53. Simionescu M., Horváthová Z., Kovshun N., Kushnir N. Social media, sustainability, and environmental protection in sustainable education. First conference on sustainable development, E3S Web Conference. 2020; 208: 90- 229.
54. Solomon M.R. Consumer Behavior: Buying, Having, Being. Boston, MA: Pearson; 2013.
55. Narti S. Sari, S. Representation of Gender Discrimination and Patriarchal Culture in Movie of Mulan 2020 (Roland Barthes Semiotics Analysis). Legal Brief. 2022; 11(3):1813-1820.
56. Tekinalp, Ş. Uzun, R. İletişim araştırmaları ve kuramları. Derin Yayınları; 2004.
57. Ulya M., Rezaian M.A. The Representation of Multicultural Education in Film “Raya and The Last Dragon”. Proceedings Series on Physical & Formal Sciences. 2022; 3: 59-62.
58. Ummy H., Titiek S.N. Representation of Women in the Layangan Putus Film Series:Semiotic Analysis of Roland Barthes. Komunika: Jurnal Dakwah dan Komunikasi. 2023; 17(2): 161-173.
59. Umoian F., Namurtalaq B. Barbie doll semiotics with Roland Barthes mythologies. Bagh Nazar. 2022; 19(112): 53-66.
60. Washington h., Piccolo, J., Gomez-Baggethun, E., Kopnina, H., Alberro, H. The Trouble with Anthropocentric Hubris, with Examples from Conservation. Consevation. 2021; 2(4): 285-299.
61. Wibowo G. Representasi Perempuan dalam Film Siti. Nyimak: Journal of Communication. 2019; 3(1), 47-59.‏