Evaluating Climate Change Underwriting Approaches in Iran’s Insurance Industry

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
1 Assistant Professor, Insurance Research Center. Tehran, Iran
2 Research Group of Environmental Engineering and Pollution Monitoring, Research Center for Environment and Sustainable Development, RCESD, Department of Environment, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran
3 Master in Financial Mathematics, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran
4 Ph.D. in Water Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
Abstract
Aims: The insurance strategy of direct insurers (reinsurers) should be in accordance with actuarial risk-based principles. Therefore, every decision and action taken by insurance institutions in relation to climate change adaptation requires a risk assessment. Therefore, examining international underwriting and dealing with the climate change insurance process in Iran can provide useful strategies to managers. This research has been done in order to investigate the situation of Iran's insurance industry in the underwriting of climate change.

Materials & methods: In the beginning, insurance plans and coverage and climate change risk management strategies are reviewed in selected developed and developing countries. Then, the experiences of global surveys, regarding climate change are used in order to develop a questionnaire in line with the current situation of Iran country in the field of climate change insurance.


Finding: The results of the questionnaire’s analysis distributed among 35 insurance experts on climate change risk management, show that some insurance companies, despite predicting the impact of climate risks in their insurance processes and empowering their employees, don’t have any plan for the assessment and mitigation of greenhouse gases, regular assessment of climate hazards, providing incentives and modeling. Also, the strategy of annual re-pricing and risk-based pricing has the highest priority to face climate change in insurance companies.

Conclusion: Most of the country's insurance companies use different strategies to deal with climate change, of which annual repricing and risk-based pricing have been the most popular.
Keywords

Subjects


1. IAIS., Issues Paper on Climate Change Risks to the Insurance Sector. International Association of Insurance Supervisors. 2018; 1-81. https://www.insurancejournal.com/research/app/uploads/2018/08/IAIS_and_SIF_Issues_Paper_on_Climate_Change_Risks_to_the_Insurance_Sector_-1.pdf
2. IPCC., Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Cambridge University Press, Cambridge United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 2014; 1-32. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/WGIIAR5-FrontMatterA_FINAL.pdf
3. IPCC., Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, 2022; Switzerland. ISBN 978-92-9169-159-3. https://report.ipcc.ch/ar6/wg2/IPCC_AR6_WGII_FullReport.pdf
4. Farzaneh M., Zamani B., & Hamzeh A., Risks and solutions of the insurance industry in the face of climate change, Tehran: Insurance Research Center. 2019; https://www.irc.ac.ir/fa-IR/Irc/4946/Articles/view/14643/1282
5. EIOPA., On non-life Underwriting and Pricing in Light of Climate Change, The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority, 2021; 1-48. https://www.eiopa.europa.eu/system/files/2021-07/report-impact-underwriting.pdf
6. Golnaraghi M., Climate change and the insurance industry: Taking action as risk managers and investors. The Geneva Assoc., 2018; 1-48. https://www.genevaassociation.org/sites/default/files/research-topics-documenttype/pdf_public/climate_change_and_the_insurance_industry_taking_action_as_risk_managers_and_investors.pdf
7. Kondrup C., et al. Climate Adaptation Modelling, Springer Climate, Springer, Cham, 2022; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86211-4
8. CCS., Analyzing catastrophe data in Spain. Consorcio de Compensación de Seguros. 2020; https://www.consorsegurosdigital.com/en/numero-13/front-page
9. Walkowicz T., Italian Non-Life incorporating climate change into risk management, Vice President Global Financial Institutions Group, DBRS Morningstar, 2021; 1-5. https://dbrs.morningstar.com/research/378465/dbrs-morningstar-italian-non-life-insuranceincorporating-climate-change-into-risk-management
10. OECD., OECD Environmental Performance Reviews: Turkey 2019, OECD Environmental Performance Reviews, OECD Publishing, Paris, 2019; https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264309753-en.
11. Shiravand H., Hamzeh A., Alibakhshi Z., Investigating the occurrence of hurricanes in the world and Iran with the climate change risk management approach in the insurance industry, Tehran: Insurance Research Center. 2019; https://www.irc.ac.ir/fa-IR/Irc/4946/Articles/view/14643/1307
12. PIAM., PIAM Member Companies Expediting Flood Claims. Retrieved from PIAM: 2021; https://piam.org.my/blog/2021/01/11/piam-member-companies-expediting-flood-claims/
13. Roslan R., Omar R.,C., Hara M., Solemon B., Baharuddin I.,Z., (2019) Flood insurance rate map for non-structural mitigation, The 4th International Conference on Science and Technology. 2019; https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20197603002.
14. French C.C., America on fire: climate change, wildfires & insuring natural catastrophes, U.C. Davis L. Rev. 2020; 54:817-885. https://elibrary.law.psu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1407&context=fac_works
15. Kong F., Sun S., Better understanding the catastrophe risk in interconnection and comprehensive disaster risk defense capability, with special reference to China. Sustainability, 2021; 13: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041793
16. Sandberg E., Økland A., Tyholt I.,L., Natural perils insurance and compensation arrangements in six countries. Klima 2050 Report No 21E, 2020; 1-78. https://sintef.brage.unit.no/sintef-xmlui/handle/11250/2659936
17. Thiebes B., Winkhardt-Enz R., Schwarze R., Pickl S., Invited perspectives: Challenges and step changes for natural hazard – perspectives from the German Committee for Disaster Reduction (DKKV), Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 2022; 22: 1969–1972, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-1969-2022
18. USAID., Climate Risk Profile: Mexico, The U.S. Agency for International Development, 2017; 1-6. https://www.usaid.gov/climate/country-profiles/mexico
19. NAIC., Climate Risk Disclosure Survey Guidance Reporting Year 2020. NAIC, 2020; 1-6. https://www.insurance.wa.gov/sites/default/files/documents/climate-risk-disclosure-survey-guidance-reporting-year-2020.pdf
20. BMA., Climate Change Survey Report. Bermuda Monetary Authority, 2021; 1-16. https://cdn.bma.bm/documents/2021-03-15-13-26-51-2020-Climate-Survey-Report.pdf
21. UNEP FI., Insuring Climate Resilience. United Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative, 2013; 1-32. https://www.unepfi.org/fileadmin/documents/insuring_climate_resilience_01.pdf
22. CO2focus, Assessing risks and implementing measures, Nordic Insurers’ Responses to Climate Change, 2013; 1-16. https://www.svenskforsakring.se/globalassets/rapporter/nordisk-klimatkonferens-i-kopenhamn-2009/nordic-insurers-responses-to-climate-change-2013.pdf/