Maximizing Water Productivity and Minimizing Virtual Water for Determining an Agronomic-Economic Program and Optimizing the Crop Production Strategy in the Sistan Region, Iran

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
1 1- Assistant Professor, Agriculture Institute, Research Institute of zabol
2 2- Associate Professor, Management and Economic Faculty, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran
Abstract
Global warming and the loss of freshwater resources have turned attention to promoting crop water productivity by focusing on the role of crops’ embedded virtual water. Indeed, the production pattern based on maximizing water productivity and minimizing virtual water is gradually replacing the traditional patterns that were based on maximizing production and yields.

Methods: The present research aimed to present a cropping pattern and water allocation to crops and regions based on the virtual water scenario and water productivity. The research used a bi-level programming model (leader-follower) and applied the objectives of maximizing economic profit and water productivity and minimizing the Gini coefficient and virtual water to optimize irrigation water allocation among irrigated regions and crops and determine the optimal cropping pattern for crops in five regions, including Zabol, Zahak, Nimruz, Hamun, and Hirmand, for 2022-2023.

Findings: When virtual water and water productivity were considered, the system’s economic profit was estimated at 3.02 × 1013 IRR and 3.04 × 1013 IRR, respectively. Also, the highest water and cultivation area were assigned to melon and onion.

Conclusion: Considering the Virtual water content (VWC), less water was assigned to crops with higher Virtual water content, i.e., wheat and barley. When the water productivity index was considered, the results revealed that more water was allocated to crops with higher water productivity, such as melon and onion. The proposed model can be used to determine a cropping pattern that considers minimizing virtual water and maximizing water productivity as its objectives.
Keywords

Subjects


Li M, Cao X, Liu D, Fu Q, Li T, Shang R. Sustainable management of agricultural water and land resources under changing climate and socio-economic conditions: A multi-dimensional optimization approach. Agr. Water. Manage. 2022 Jan 1; 259: 107235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107235
2. Hu JL, Ge YX. The allocation mode and coordination mechanism of water resources in the Yellow River—Also on the construction and management of the Yellow River water rights market. Manag. World. 2004; 8: 43-60. DOI:10.1007/s11269-012-0078-1
3. Feng J. Optimal allocation of regional water resources based on multi-objective dynamic equilibrium strategy. Appl. Math. Model. 2021 Feb 1; 90:1183-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2020.10.027
4. Wu D, Liu MG. Research progress on initial water rights allocation methods in river basins. People’s Pearl River. 2022; 43(7). 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9235.2022.11.003.
5. Amanat Behbahani L, Moghaddasi M, Ebrahimi H, Babazadeh H. Optimal water allocation and distribution management in irrigation networks under uncertainty by multi‐stage stochastic case study: Irrigation and drainage networks of Maroon. Irrig. Drain. 2020 Oct; 69(4): 531-45. https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.2476
6. Li M, Li J, Singh VP, Fu Q, Liu D, Yang G. Efficient allocation of agricultural land and water resources for soil environment protection using a mixed optimization-simulation approach under uncertainty. Geoderma. 2019 Nov 1; 353: 55-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.06.023
7. Xie YL, Xia DX, Ji L, Huang GH. An inexact stochastic-fuzzy optimization model for agricultural water allocation and land resources utilization management under considering effective rainfall. Ecol. Indic. 2018 Sep 1; 92: 301-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.09.026
8. Ghaffari Moghadam Z, Moradi E, Hashemi Tabar M, Sardar Shahraki A. Developing a Bi-level programming model for water allocation based on Nerlove’s supply response theory and water market. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2023 Jun; 25(6): 5663-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02658-z
9. Sardar Shahraki A, Emami S. The economic evaluation of optimal water allocation using artificial neural network (Case study: Moghan plain). Iran Econ. Rev. 2020 Sep 1; 24(3): 833-51. 10.22059/IER.2020.77650
10. Dahmardeh Ghaleno MR, Sadoddin A, Sheikh V, Sabouhi Sabouni M. Optimal utilization of the chahnimeh water reservoirs in Sistan region of Iran using goal programming method. Ecopersia. 2017 Mar 10; 5(1): 1641-54. http://ecopersia.modares.ac.ir/article-24-4598-en.html
11. Dahmardeh Ghaleno MR, Sheikh V, Sadoddin A, Sabouhi Sabouni M. Optimal cropping pattern for water resources management in Sistan region of Iran using goal programming method. Ecopersia. 2016 Dec 10; 4(4): 1555-67. http://ecopersia.modares.ac.ir/article-24-8718-en.html
12. AliAhmadi N, Moradi E, Hoseini S.M, Sardar Shahraki A. Simulation of the dynamics of water resources in the Hirmand watershed under economic and environmental scenarios. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2023; 25: 15091-15117. 10.1007/s10668-022-02713-9
13. Sardar Shahraki A, Shahraki J, Hashemi Monfared S.A. An integrated model for economic assessment of environmental scenarios for dust stabilization and sustainable flora–fauna ecosystem in international Hamoun wetland. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2021; 23: 947-967. 10.1007/s10668-020-00616-1
14. Sardar Shahraki A, Shahraki J, Hashemi Monfared S.A. An integrated Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method combined with the WEAP model for prioritizing agricultural development, case study: Hirmand Catchment. Ecopersia. 2018; 6: 205-214. http://ecopersia.modares.ac.ir/article-24-16023-en.html
15. Shahbakhsh F, Safdari M, Sardar Shahraki A. Assessment of modern approach of water governance in the development of water exploitation systems in Sistan region. J. Appl. Res. Water Wastewater. 2020; 7(2): 127-136. https://doi.org/10.22126/arww.2021.4205.1125
16. Abdelkader A, Elshorbagy A, Tuninetti M, Laio F, Ridolfi LF, Fahmy H, Hoekstra AY. National water, food, and trade modeling framework: The case of Egypt. Sci. Total Environ. 2018 Oct 15; 639: 485-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.197
17. Allan JA. Fortunately there are substitutes for water otherwise our hydro-political futures would be impossible. Priorities for water resources allocation and management. 1993 Jul; 13(4): 26. https://www.ircwash.org/sites/default/files/210-93PR-11967.pdf#page=18
18. Hoekstra AY. Virtual water: An introduction. Virtual water trade. 2003 Feb;13:108. https://www.worldwatercouncil.org/fileadmin/wwc/Programs/Virtual_Water/VirtualWater_Proceedings_IHE.pdf#page=13
19. Hoekstra AY, Mekonnen MM. The water footprint of humanity. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences. 2012 Feb 28; 109(9): 3232-7. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1109936109
20. Yousefi H, Mohammadi A, Noorollahi Y. Prioritization in Exporting Agricultural Products Using Virtual Water Concept (Case study: Melon and Watermelon). Ecopersia. 2019 Apr 10; 7(2): 125-32. http://ecopersia.modares.ac.ir/article-24-16733-en.html
21. Hoekstra AY. The water footprint assessment manual: Setting the global standard. Routledge; 2011.192. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849775526
22. Zhang Y, Zhang J, Wang C, Cao J, Liu Z, Wang L. China and Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement countries: Estimation of the virtual water trade of agricultural products. J. Clean. Prod. 2017 Jan 1; 140: 1493-503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.001
23. Zhi Y, Hamilton PB, Wang X, Zhang Z, Liang L. Game theory analysis of the virtual water strategy. Water Resour. Manag. 2018 Nov; 32: 4747-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-2081-7
24. Qu S, Liang S, Konar M, Zhu Z, Chiu AS, Jia X, Xu M. Virtual water scarcity risk to the global trade system. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018 Jan 16; 52(2): 673-83. http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.
25. Jahanbeen H. Optimal allocation of irrigation water in agriculture based on the concept of virtual water in arid and cold climates of Karun catchment, MA dissertation, Faculty of Agriculture, Agricultural Economics Department. Zabol University. 2015. https://ganj.irandoc.ac.ir/viewer/b5f02d8231b0a2b3929c7fee98f56240
26. Shahidi A, Morovatneshan A. Agricultural water management approach through the technique of virtual water genetic optimization (GA)(Case study: Birjand plain). Iran. J. Irrig. Drain. 2017 Feb 19; 10(6): 714-22. https://idj.iaid.ir/article_55454_b459982af601bc9be2c0621c9861747b.pdf?lang=en
27. Sedghamiz A, Heidarpour M, Nikoo MR, Eslamian S. A game theory approach for conjunctive use optimization model based on virtual water concept. Civil Eng. J. 2018 Jun; 4(6): 1315-25. DOI: 10.28991/cej-0309175
28. Xu X, Yuan J, Yu Q. A Study on Water Rights Allocation in Transboundary Rivers Based on the Transfer and Inequality Index of Virtual Water. Water. 2023 Jun 28; 15(13): 2379. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15132379
29. Delpasand M, Bozorg-Haddad O, Goharian E, Loáiciga HA. Virtual water trade: Economic development and independence through optimal allocation. Agr. Water Manage. 2023 Jan 1; 275: 108022.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2022.108022
30. Ye Q, Li Y, Zhuo L, Zhang W, Xiong W, Wang C, Wang P. Optimal allocation of physical water resources integrated with virtual water trade in water scarce regions: A case study for Beijing, China. Water Res. 2018 Feb 1; 129: 264-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.11.036
31. Su X, Li J, Singh VP. Optimal allocation of agricultural water resources based on virtual water subdivision in Shiyang River Basin. Water Resour. Manag. 2014 Jun; 28: 2243-57. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11269-014-0611-5
32. Hekmatnia M, Safdari M, Hosseini SM, Sardar Shahraki A. Agricultural water use management of Sistan region under virtual water approach using WEAP model. Environ. Water Eng. 2021 Oct 23; 7(3): 465-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0611-5
33. Shahriari M, Ziaee S, Shakeri Bostanabad R. The effects of Targeted subsidies on water efficiency in industry and agriculture sectors. J. Environ. Sci. Stud. 2022 Jun 22; 7(2): 84-95. 10.22034/JESS.2022.319051.1693
34. Keshavarz H, Dehghani Sanich A. Water productivity index and solutions for future agricultural activities in Iran. Econom. Strat. 2012; 1(1): 199-233. https://econrahbord.csr.ir/article_103211_bc3fdc8c98d49fdf826dd97f5d0c8ab4.pdf?lang=en
35. Tehran Chamber of Commerce Industries, Mines, and Agriculture. 2016. The first international conference on virtual water. Available at: http:// www.tccim.ir/annboardarchive.aspx3.
36. Shahrokhnia MA, Eslami A, Baghani J. Investigation of applied water and water productivity of wheat fields in Fars province. Water Res. Eng. 2022 Apr 21; 15(52): 114-28. 10.30495/WEJ.2021.27044.2288
37. Pouran R, Raghfar H. Investigation of crop cultivation pattern of Semnan and Ilam provinces by emphasizing the role of virtual water in water productivity. J. Water Sustain. Dev. 2021 May 22; 8(1): 97-106. 10.22067/JWSD.V8I1.88854
38. Karimzadeh M, Alizadeh A, Ansari H, Ghorbani M, Banayan Aval M. Optimizing Water Productivity and Energy Efficiency in Selecting Crop Pattern. Iran. J. Irrig. Drain. 2017 Feb 19; 10(6): 849-59. https://idj.iaid.ir/article_55482_cfa3979e44275ba9f7356a707aa94dca.pdf?lang=en
39. Khoramivafa M, Nouri M, Mondani F, Veisi H. Evaluation of Virtual Water, Water Productivity and Ecological Footprint in Wheat and Maize Farms in West of Iran: A Case Study of Kouzaran Region, Kermanshah Province J. Water Sustain. Dev. 2017; 3(2-7): 19-26. 10.22067/JWSD.V3I2.50280
40. Sardar Shahraki A. Optimal Allocation of Water Resources of Hirmand Basin by Application of Game Theory and Evaluating the Managerial Scenarios. Ph.D. Thesis in agricultural economic university of Sistan and Baluchestan. 2016. https://ganj.irandoc.ac.ir//viewer/010a6d08183e2c312d5d29f5b9dad5a0
41. Cai Y, Rong Q, Yang Z, Yue W, Tan Q, An export coefficient based inexact fuzzy bi-level multi-objective programming model for the management of agricultural nonpoint source pollution under uncertainty. J. Hydrol. 2018; 557: 713–725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.12.067
42. Xu Z, Yao L, Zhou X, Moudi M, Zhang L. Optimal irrigation for sustainable development considering water rights transaction: A Stackelberg-Nash-Cournot equilibrium model. J. Hydrol. 2019 Aug 1; 575: 628-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.05.063
43. Molden DJ, Sakthivadivel R, Perry CJ, De Fraiture C. Indicators for comparing performance of irrigated agricultural systems. Research report 20. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute. Iwmi; 1998. https://www.iwmi.cgiar.org/Publications/IWMI_Research_Reports/PDF/PUB020/REPORT20.PDF
44. Rafiee V, Shourian M, Attari J. Optimum crop patterning by integrating SWAT and the harmony search optimization algorithm. Iran -Water Res. Res. 2017; 13(3): 73-88. https://www.iwrr.ir/article_44693_b4a801612d0eb0c2b0b6103d54c962f5.pdf
45. Ghaffari Moghadam Z, Moradi E, Hashemi Tabar M, Sardar Shahraki A. Optimal Allocation Of Water Resources In The Agricultural Sector by Using The Stackelberg-Nash-Cournot Model and emphasis on water market (Case Study: Sistan Plain Pipe Water Transfer Project). Iran. J. Ecohydrology. 2022 Mar 21; 9(1): 273-89. 10.22059/IJE.2022.333388.1575