Application of Maximum Entropy Model and Remote Sensing Technique to predict susceptible areas to dust storms in Isfahan Province, Iran

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
1 PhD student , Department of Arid Land Management, Faculty of Natural Resources and Earth Sciences,University of Kashan, Kashan, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Arid Lands Management, Faculty of Natural Resources and Earth Sciences, University of Kashan, Kashan, Iran.(vali@kashanu.ac.ir)
Abstract
Aims: This study modeled sensitive areas to dust storms in Isfahan province, which is sensitive to successive droughts, and dust storms because of its climatic condition, and proximity to the desert, using meteorological codes related to dust, AOD values, and Maximum Entropy model (MaxEnt).

Materials & methods: 200 occurrence points of dust were determined using dust meteorological codes and AOD values of MODIS sensor, Terra satellite, (2011-2022). Ten parameters including temperature, rainfall, albedo, altitude, slope, land use, enhanced vegetation index (EVI), normalized difference moisture index (NDMI), normalized difference salinity index (NDSI), and frequency percentage of erosive wind seed were considered dust-predictive factors. Finally, the MaxEnt model was utilized for modeling dust susceptibility. The performance of the model was specified using the AUC value and the importance of each influential factor was identified utilizing the Jackknife test.

Findings: The findings indicated that areas susceptible to dust are mainly bare lands, salt lands, and poor rangeland located mostly in the north, northeast to parts of the east and southeast of the Province, and also the central parts towards the southwest of Isfahan Province. According to the results, the MaxEnt model, with AUC=0.72, had a good efficiency in modeling susceptible areas to dust storms in Isfahan Province.

Conclusion: The major conclusion of this study is that the MaxEnt model had good performance in mapping susceptible areas to dust in Isfahan Province. The results of this research can be useful for decision-makers in identifying the areas prone to dust storms.

Keywords

Subjects


1. Alipour N., et al. Synoptic analysis of dust events and its relation with drought in Alborz and Qazvin provinces. Geography (Regional Planning). 2018; 8(2): 59-68. 20.1001.1.22286462.1397.8.2.4.3.
2. Pourhashemi S., et al. Determination of Geomorphological and Land Use Features of Dust Harvesting Sources (Case Study: Khorasan Razavi Provience). Arid Region Geographic Studies. 2019; 9(34), 14-24.https://sid.ir/paper/382487/en.
3. Boali A., Jafari R., Bashari H. Wind erosion estimation and assessment using Bayesian belief networks in eastern Isfahan township. Desert Ecosystem Engineering. 2022; 6(14): 45-58. https://www.jdmal.ir/article_244522.html#0.
4. Naeimi M., et al. Climatic factors affecting dune mobility in the west of Khorasan Razavi Province, Iran. Journal Geographical Research Desert Areas. 2020; 7(2): 25-45. 20.1001.1.2345332.1398.7.2.2.2.
5. Namdari S., et al. Impacts of climate and synoptic fluctuations on dust storm activity over the Middle East. . Atmos. Environ. 2018; 173: 265-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.11.016.
6. Ghomeshion M., et al. Investigating the effect of land cover on dust spatial distribution in Southern Khuzestan province. ECOPERSIA 2020; 10(3): 179-189. 20.1001.1.23222700.2022.10.3.2.9.
7. Akhzari D., et al. Effect of source areas anthropogenic activities on dust storm occurrences in the western parts of Iran. .Environ. Resour. Res. 2014; 2(2): 124-132. 20.1001.1.23222700.2015.3.4.3.3.
8. Darvand S., et al. Comparison of machine learning models to prioritize susceptible areas to dust production. Journal Range Watershed Management. 2021; 74(1): 53-68. https://doi.org/10.22059/jrwm.2021.321033.1580.
9. Lin X., et al. Machine learning for source identification of dust on the Chinese Loess Plateau. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2020; 47(21): e2020GL088950. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL088950.
10. Rahmati O., et al. Hybridized neural fuzzy ensembles for dust source modeling and prediction. Atmos. Environ. 2020; 224: 117320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117320.
11. Boroughani M., et al. Application of remote sensing techniques and machine learning algorithms in dust source detection and dust source susceptibility mapping. Ecol. Inform. 2020; 56: 101059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2020.101059.
12. Zaker E. A. (2012). Combating with desertification process by an emphasis on capabilities of desert areas (case study: Isfahan province). Environ. Stud .2012; 38(3), 155-164. https://jes.ut.ac.ir/article_29157.html.
13. Gholami H., et al. Integrated modelling for mapping spatial sources of dust in central Asia-An important dust source in the global atmospheric system. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 2021; 12(9): 101173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2021.101173.
14. Yong M., et al. Impacts of land surface conditions and land use on dust events in the inner Mongolian grasslands, China. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. Ecol. Evol 2021; 9: 664900. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.664900.
15. Akhzari D., Pessarakli M., Shayesteh K., Bashir Gonbad M. Effect of source areas anthropogenic activities on dust storm occurrences in the western parts of Iran. Environ. Resour. Res. 2014; 2(2): 124-132. 10.22069/ijerr.2014.2210
16. Akhzari D., Farokhzadeh B., Saeedi I., Goodarzi M. Effects of wind erosion and soil salinization on dust storm emission in western Iran. Jouranl Rangeland Science. 2015. https://journals.iau.ir/article_512666.html.
17. Sohil F., Sohali M.U., Shabbir J. An introduction to statistical learning with applications in R. Stat. theory relat. fields. 2020; 6(1): 87-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/24754269.2021.1980261
18. Berger A., Della Pietra S. A., Della Pietra V. J. A maximum entropy approach to natural language processing. Comput. Linguist. Assoc. 1996; 22(1): 39-71. https://aclanthology.org/J96-1002.
19. Woodbury A., Render F., Ulrych T. Practical probabilistic ground‐water modeling. Groundwater. 1995; 33(4): 532-538. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1995.tb00307.x
20. Abolhasani A., et al. A new conceptual framework for spatial predictive modelling of land degradation in a semiarid area. 20. Land. Degrad. Dev. 2022; 33(17): 3358-3374. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.4391.
21. Robinson S. Simulation: the practice of model development and use. Bloomsbury Publishing. 2014.
22. JavanNezhad R., Rezaie M. Modeling the Role of Climate in Distribution of two-spotted spider mite: Case study of Tehran province. Journal Environmental Science Studies. 2020; 5(2): 2554-2559. https://www.jess.ir/article_107137_en.html?lang=en.
23. Yesilnacar E. K. The application of computational intelligence to landslide susceptibility mapping in Turkey, [Parkville, Victoria] : University of Melbourne Department, 200. 2005. https://cat2.lib.unimelb.edu.au/record=b2995654~S6
24. Mehrabi S., Soltani S., Jafari R. Analyzing the relationship between dust storm occurrence and climatic parameters. Journal Science Technology Agriculture Natural Resources. 2015; 19(71): 69-81.http://dx.doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.jstnar.19.71.69.
25. Ghohardoust A., Soleimani Sardoo F. Investigating the Effect of Vegetation on the Occurrence of Dust Phenomenon (Case Study: Hormozgan Province). ). Environmental Erosion Research Journal. 2022; 12(2): 43-60.20.1001.1.22517812.1401.12.2.6.3 .
26. Wang W., et al. Machine learning-based prediction of sand and dust storm sources in arid Central Asia. Int. J. Digit. Earth. 2023; 16(1): 1530-1550. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2023.2202421.
27. Rahmati O., Pourghasemi H. R., Melesse A. M. Application of GIS-based data driven random forest and maximum entropy models for groundwater potential mapping: a case study at Mehran Region, Iran.Catena. 2016; 137: 360-372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2015.10.010.
28. Siahkamari S., et al. Spatial prediction of flood-susceptible areas using frequency ratio and maximum entropy models. Geocarto. Int. 2018; 33(9): 927-941. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2017.1316780.
29. Abolhasani A., et al. A new conceptual framework for spatial predictive modelling of land degradation in a semiarid area. ARID. LAND. RES. MANAG. 2022; 33(17): 3358-3374. 10.1080/15324982.2023.2298996.
30. Afshari M., Vali A.A. Effectiveness of Remote Sensing and Machine Learning Algorithms in Zoning Areas Prone to Dust in Isfahan Province. Desert Management. 2023; 11(3): 73-https://www.jdmal.ir/article_708763.html.