Local Community’s Attitude and Satisfaction Towards the Environmental Effectiveness of Urmia Lake Restoration Actions

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
1 Graduated of Rangeland Management, Faculty of Natural Resources Department of Range and Watershed Management, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran.
2 BAssistance Professor, Faculty of Natural Resources, Department of Range and Watershed Management, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran.
3 Associate Professor, Faculty of Natural Resources, Department of Range and Watershed Management, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran.
Abstract
Aim Urmia Lake Restoration Headquarters has carried out actions since its establishment until now, and there are disagreements between supporters and opponents about its outputs. For this purpose, in the year 2021, this research was conducted to evaluate the environmental effectiveness of the actions of rehabilitation headquarters from the point of view of local communities. Materials & Methods an applied and fundamental research was done to reach the study golds. . In terms of method, regarding to the nature of the subject and research objectives, the descriptive-analytical and survey method (survey of local communities) has been used. The tool for collecting information and data was a researcher-made questionnaire that was randomly filled through interviews with residents. Findings The results showed that different actions have significant differences in terms of respondents' satisfaction, so the highest level of satisfaction, with a value of 2.89, is related to the non-living windbreak, and the lowest level is related to the Poly -Shrub Planting with the value of 1.67. Conclusion In general, despite the relative success of the actions of the rehabilitation headquarters, these actions have not been full effective in the proper management of surface and subsurface water resources, the modification of the cultivation pattern, and the prevention of the spread of soil salinity in agricultural lands. Therefore, to prevent the environmental disaster and its destructive consequences, it is suggested to take urgent action to save Urmia Lake by using all local and international capacities.
Keywords

Subjects


1. Motamedi J., Mofidi-Chelan M., Khodagheli M. The Effectiveness of Urmia Lake Resuscitation Measures from an Economic, Social and Environmental Perspective. Iran Nature 2019; 4(5): 19-27 (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22092/irn.2019.120508
2. Mokhtari Hashi H. Politics and Space: A Theoretical Analysis of the Impact of Neoliberalism on Water Crisis. ECOPERSIA 2022; 26 (1 and 1401):1-29. http://hsmsp.modares.ac.ir/article-21-55078-en.html
3. Parsinejad M., Rosenberg D.E., Ghale Y.A., Khazaei B., Null S.E., Raja O., Safaie A., Sima S., Sorooshian A., Wurtsbaugh W.A. 40-years of Lake Urmia restoration research: Review, synthesis and next steps. Sci. Total Environ. 2022; 1, 832:155055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155055
4. Surya B., Syafri S., Sahban H., Sakti H.H. Natural resource conservation based on community economic empowerment: Perspectives on watershed management and slum settlements in Makassar City, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Land 2020; 9(4): 104:1-31. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9040104
5. Sayah Mofazli A., Rahmati F. The Experience of Iran's Wetlands Protection Project in Modeling the Participation of local Communities in the Restoration of Lake Urmia through the Establishment of Sustainable Agriculture. Mehr Sadegh Press 2016; p.115 (In Persian). http://www.wetlandsproject.ir/publications/books/detail/Modeling-Local-Community-Participation-in-Lake-Urmia-Restoration/1004/view/
6. Wei X., Zhou L., Yang G, Wang Y., Chen Y. Assessing the effects of desertification control projects from the farmers’ perspective: A case study of Yanchi County, Northern China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020; 17(3):983. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030983
7. Mohammadiyeghani B., Valaei M., Charaghi M. The Effects of Water level Decline on Agriculture of Rural areas around Urumia Lake. Case Study: Northern Marhamatabad County, Miyandoab Township. J. Geogr. Environ. Hazards 2013; 2(1): 55-72 (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22067/geo.v2i1.18068
8. Saemian P., Elmi O., Vishwakarma B.D, Tourian M.J, Sneeuw N. Analyzing the Lake Urmia restoration progress using ground-based and spaceborne observations. Sci. Total Environ. 2020; 739: 139857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139857
9. Pourahmad A., Heydari R. Investigation of environmental pollution in the countries of the Islamic world. J. Polit. Res. 2015; 6 (1): 143-170 (In Persian). http://priw.ir/article-1-28-fa.html
10. Azarbar S., Mofidi-Chelan M., Sheidai-Karkaj E. Evaluating the effects of Lake Urmia’s revival practices on the environmental resilience of local rural settlements. J. Environ. Sci. Stud. 2023; 8(2): 6704-6714. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22034/JESS.2023.379844.1948
11. Barani Pesyan V., Porakrami M., Fotouhi Mehrbani B. The Investigation of Lake Urmia Drying Trend and Its Important Consequence on the Surrounding Settlements. J. Rural Res. 2017; 8(3): 438-453 (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22059/jrur.2017.63473
12. Salimi-Torkamani H. The Study of Environmental Degradation of Orumieh Lake from Environmental International Law Point of View. Strategy 2011; 20, 58(1):177-202 (In Persian). https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.10283102.1390.20.1.5.0
13. ULRP, 2015. Urmia Lake Restoration Program: Brief Report and Projects Outline. Urmia Lake Restoration Program and Sharif University of Technology. (In Persian). http://ewrc.sharif.ir/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/p-Urmia-arab-2016.pdf
14. Mohammadi hamidi S., Nazmfar H., Ahad R., Yazdani M.H. Futurology of the Economic Drivers of Urmia Lake Water Level Fluctuations on the Spatial Unbalanced. ECOPERSIA 2020; 24 (4): 69-97. http://hsmsp.modares.ac.ir/article-21-42733-en.html
15. Hurlimann, A., Dolnicar, S., & Meyer P. 2009. Understanding behavior to inform water supply management in developed nations–a review of literature, conceptual model and research agenda. J. Environ. Manage. 91(1), 47-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.07.014
16. Schwarz, N., & Bohner, G. 2001. The construction of attitudes. Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intraindividual processes, 436-457. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470998519.ch20
17. Mehri A., Mazloomy Mahmoodabad S.S., Morowati sharifabad M.A., Naderian H. Determinants of helmet use behavior among employed motorcycle riders in Yazd, Iran, based on theory of planned behavior. Injury 2010; 42(9), 864-869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2010.08.030
18. Amini M., Kouhestani H., Kazemiyeh F. Recognition and Prioritization of the Economic, Social and Environmental Consequences of Drying of Lake Urmia in the Surrounding Villages. J. Sustain. Dev. 2021; 8(1): 51-62. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22067/jwsd.v8i1.88477
19. Taherdoost H. What is the best response scale for survey and questionnaire design; review of different lengths of rating scale/attitude scale/Likert scale. Int. j. acad. res. manag. 2019; 8 (1):1-10. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3588604
20. Dragan I.M., Isaic-Maniu A. Snowball sampling completion. J. Stud. Soc. Sci. 2013; 5(2): 160-177. https://infinitypress.info/index.php/jsss/article/view/355
21. Saroukhani, B. Research methods in social sciences: principles and foundations (volume 1). Vaziri Press 2014: p. 542. (In Persian).
22. Khashtabeh R., Akbari M., Kolahi M., Talebanfard A. Assessing the effects of desertification control projects using socio-economic indicators in the arid regions of eastern Iran. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2021; 23; 10455-10469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01065-6
23. Kheirfam H., Asadzadeh F. Feasibility of Mowing Sands Stabilization in the Dried-up Beds of Lake Urmia using Inoculation and Stimulation of Soil Native Cyanobacteria. Appl. Soil Res. 2020; 8(1): 31-43. (In Persian). https://asr.urmia.ac.ir/article_120843.html?lang=en
24. Vacek Z., Řeháček D., Cukor J., Vacek S., Khel T., Sharma R.P., Kučera J., Král J., Papaj V. Windbreak efficiency in agricultural landscape of the Central Europe: multiple approaches to wind erosion control. J. Environ. Manage. 2018; 62: 942-54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-018-1090-x
25. Baker T.P., Moroni M.T, Hunt M.A., Worledge D., Mendham D.S. Temporal, environmental and spatial changes in the effect of windbreaks on pasture microclimate. Agric. For Meteorol. 2021; 297, 108265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108265
26. Baker T.P., Moroni M.T., Mendham D., Smith R., Hunt M.A. Impacts of windbreak shelter on crop and livestock production. Crop Pasture Sci. 2018; 69(8): 785-796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108265
27. Jafari M., Tahmoures M., Ehteram M., Ghorbani M., Panahi F. Wind Erosion Biological Control. In Soil Erosion Control in Drylands. Springer International Publishing 2022; pp. 297-399. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04859-3_3
28. Englund O., Börjesson P., Mola-Yudego B., Berndes G., Dimitriou I., Cederberg C., Scarlat N. Strategic deployment of riparian buffers and windbreaks in Europe can co-deliver biomass and environmental benefits. Commun. Earth Environ. 2021; 2(1): 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00247-y
29. Smith M.M., Bentrup G., Kellerman T., MacFarland K., Straight R., Ameyaw L. Windbreaks in the United States: A systematic review of producer-reported benefits, challenges, management activities and drivers of adoption. Agric. Syst. 2021; 187: 103032.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.103032