Elements Describing the Distribution of Plant Functional Groups in Mountainous Rangelands

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
E. Jahantab 1
R. Yari 2
E. Sheidai-Karkaj 3
M. Yousefian 4
1 Department of range and Watershed Management, Faculty of Agriculture, Fasa University, Fasa, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Khorasan-e-Razavi Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Mashhad. Iran.
3 Associate Prof., Department of Range and Watershed Management, Faculty of Natural Resources, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran.
4 Research Assistant Prof., Forest and Rangelands Research Department, Mazandaran Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Sari, Iran.
10.22034/ecopersia.11.2.141
Abstract
Aim Plant functional groups are categories of species that exhibit similar responses to environmental parameters. The current research was carried out to evaluate factors that describe the distribution of plant functional groups in mountainous rangelands of Chaharbagh, Golestan.

Methods Three transects of 300 meters were considered in the representative area of each plant type. Along each transect, 10 plots were considered in dimensions of 2 x 2 meters. The names of species, the percentage of vegetation, and the number of species were determined. Six soil samples were collected for each plant type. The biological form of each plant species was determined. Plants were classified based on edibility, vegetative form, biological form, and life span. To evaluate the relationship between environmental factors and plant functional groups, Redundancy Detrended Analysis (RDA) was applied.

Findings The results showed that the occurrence of phanerophytes was affected by electrical conductivity and lime. With an increase in potassium, the frequency of camophytes increased. Palatability values of the first class were affected by direction, saturated moisture content, and organic carbon. Values of tree-type growth were affected by electrical conductivity and lime. Forb vegetation increased in correlation with clay percentage. Grass and pseudo-grass vegetative forms were affected by direction factors, soil saturated moisture content, and organic carbon.

Conclusion Overall, a precise study of differences in plant functional groups can be an important approach for monitoring changes in rangeland under management strategies which require further attention in future research.

Keywords
Environmental factors
Palatability classes
Plant type
Summer rangelands of Chaharbagh Golestan

Subjects

1. Kelly C.K., Bowler, M.G. Coexistence and relative abundance in forest trees. Nature. 2002; 417: 437-440. https://doi.org/10.1038/417437a
2. Jangjou M., Noudoust F., Rafii F. Comparison of plant functional groups in abandoned dry lands and natural rangeland cover. J. Range Watershed Manage. 2015; 68(4): 835-851. (In Persian) 10.22059/JRWM.2015.56965
3. Babaei Kafaki S., Khademi A., Mataji, A. Relationship between leaf area index and phisiographical and edaphical condition in a Quercus macranthera stand (Case study: Andebil's forest, Khalkhal). Iran. J. Forest Poplar Res.2009; 17 (2): 280-289. (In Persian). https://ijfpr.areeo.ac.ir/article_107855.html?lang=fa
4. Titshall L.W., Connor T.G., Morris C.D. Effect of long-term exclusion of fire and herbivory on the soils and vegetation of sour grassland, Afric. J. Range Forage Sci. 2000; 17: 70-80. https://doi.org/10.2989/10220110009485742
4. Titshall L.W., Connor T.G., Morris C.D. Effect of long-term exclusion of fire and herbivory on the soils and vegetation of sour grassland, Afric. J. Range Forage Sci. 2000; 17: 70-80.
5. Sheidai Karkaj E., Mirdeylami S. Z., Akbarlou M. Relationship of the most effective soil and management factors with distribution of ecological species groups and calculating their common effect (Case study: Chahar Bagh summer rangelands, Golestan province). Iran. J. Range. Desert Res. 2015; 22(1): 31-46. (In Persian). https://ijrdr.areeo.ac.ir/article_13220.html
6. Zare Chahoki M.A., Jafari M., Azarniand H. Relationships between species diversity and environmental factors of Poshtkouh rangelands in Yazd. Pajouhesh Sazandegi. 2007; 21(1): 192-199p. (In Persian). https://www.sid.ir/paper/19139/fa.
7. Moradi H. R., Ahmadpour S. H. Investigation of morphology and soil on vegetation cover using GIS (Case study in part of rangelands Vaz watershed). J. Geographic Res. 2007; 38(58): 17-32. (In Persian). http://hsmsp.modares.ac.ir/article-21-9258-fa.html
8. Mohtashamnia S., Zahedi G., Arzani H. Vegetation ordination of steppic rangelands in relation to the edaphical & physiographical factors (Case Study: Abadeh Rangelands, Fars). J. Rangeland. 2007; 1:142-158. (In Persian). https://www.sid.ir/paper/136178/fa
9. He M.Z., Zhang J.G., X.R .Li X.R., Qian Y.L. Environmental factors affecting vegetation composition in the Alxa Plateau, China. J. Arid Environ. 2007; 69: 473–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2006.10.005
10. Yibing, Q. Impact of habitat heterogeneity on plant community pattern in Gurbantunggut Desert. Geogr. Sci. 2008; 14: 447-455.Yibing, Q., Zhaoning, W., Liyun, Z. et al. Impact of habitat heterogeneity on plant community pattern in Gurbantunggut Desert. J. Geogr. Sci. 14, 447–455 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02837488
11. Jafari M., Javadi A., Bagherpor Zarchi M., Tahmores M. Relationships between Soil characteristics and vegetation in Nodoushan Rangelands of Yazd ProvinceThe relationship between soil properties and vegetation in the rangelands of Yazd Province. J. Rangeland. 2009; 3: 29-40. (In Persian). https://www.magiran.com/paper/732851
12. Shahriari H., Abrari K., Pilehvar B., Heydari M. Response of plant functional groups to some environmental variables in Mountainous forests of Southern Zagros (Khouzestan province, Baghmalek). Iran. J. Plant Biol. 2020; 32(4): 798-814. (In Persian). https://plant.ijbio.ir/article_1380.html
13. Sadeghirad A., Eini N., Fatahi A., Sohrabi H. Relationship between environmental factors and plant composition by multivariate analysis. J. Range Watershed Manage. 2021; 74(2): 407-421. (In Persian). 10.22059/JRWM.2021.311612.1539
14. Mofidi-Chelan M., Sheidai-Karkaj E., Grazing management effects on plant functional groups in Sahand summer rangelands, Northwest, Iran. ECOPERSIA. 2022; 10(2): 85-94. http://ecopersia.modares.ac.ir/article-24-52845-en.html
15. Sheidai-Karkaj, E., Motamedi J., Akbarlou M., Alijanpour A. Floristic Structure and Vegetation Composition of Boralan Mountainous Rangelands in North-Western Azerbaijan, Iran. J. Rangeland Sci. 2012; 2(4): 697-706. https://rangeland.borujerd.iau.ir/article_513023.html
16. Ludwig J. A., Reynolds J.F. Statistical ecology a primer on methods and computing, A Wiley Interscience Publication.1988. http://opac.nlai.ir/opac-prod/bibliographic/691812
17. Yimer F., Ledin S., Abdelkadir A. Soil property variations in relation to topographic aspect and vegetation community in the south-eastern highlands of Ethiopia. For. Ecol. Manag. 2006; 232: 90–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.05.055
18. Ghahreman A. Colored Flora of Iran, Publications of the Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands. 1981. volume 28. (In Persian). http://opac.nlai.ir/opac-prod/bibliographic/598716
19. Mozaffarian V. Plant ClassificationTaxonomy, Amirkabir Publications, p. 2007. 1100. (In Persian). http://opac.nlai.ir/opac-prod/bibliographic/573166
20. Rechinger K.H., Flora Iranica. Vols. 1-181. Austria: Akademische Druck U, Verlagsantalt, Graz. 1963-2015. http://opac.nlai.ir/opac-prod/bibliographic/1811692
21. Raunkiaer C. The life forms of plants and statistical plant geography. Clarendon Press, Oxford. 1934. https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.271790
22. Faraji F., Alijanpour A., Sheidai Karkaj E., Motamedi J. The consequences of banqueting and fire on plant functional groups (Case study: Atbatan rangelands, Bostanabad County). ECOPERSIA. 2020; 8(4):191-198. https://ecopersia.modares.ac.ir/article-24-38912-en.html
23. Tahmasebi P. Ordination (Multivariate analysis in science and natural resources). Shahrekord University Press. 2011. 184p. (In Persian). http://opac.nlai.ir/opac-prod/bibliographic/2339255
24. Arzani H., Abedi M. Rangeland inventory: Assessment of plant cover. Tehran University Press, Tehran. 2015. 305. (In Persian). http://opac.nlai.ir/opac-prod/bibliographic/3786412
25. Zhang J.T., Zhang F. Diversity and composition of plant functional groups in mountain forests of the Lishan Nature Reserve, North China. Bot. Stud. 2007; 48: 339-348. https://ejournal.sinica.edu.tw/bbas/content/2007/3/Bot483-12.pdf
26. Sánchez-Gonzalez A., Lopez-Mata L. Plant species richness and diversity along an altitudinal gradient in the Sierra Nevada, Mexico. Divers. Distrib. 2005; 11: 567–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1366-9516.2005.00186.x
27. Kraaij T., Milton S.J. Vegetation changes (1995, 2004) in semi،arid Karoo shrubland, South Africa: Effects of rainfall, wild herbivores and change in land use. J. Arid Environ. 2006; 64: 174-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2005.04.009
28. Marriott C.A., Hood K., Fisher J.M., Pakman R.J. Long،term impacts of extensive grazing and abandonment on the species composition. Richness, diversity and productivity of agricultural grassland. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2009; 134: 190-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2009.07.002
29. Yaynesht T., Eik L.O., Moec S.R. The effects of exlosures in restoring degraded semi،arid vegetation in communal grazing lands in northern Ethiopia. J. Arid Environ. 2009; 73: 542-549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2008.12.002
30. Guevara J.C., Sussuna P., Felker P. Opuntia forage production systems: Status and prospects for rangeland application. Rangel. Ecol. Manag. 2009; 62(5): 428-434. https://doi.org/10.2111/08-226.1
31. Gunderson L. Ecological resilience،in theory and application. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2000; .31: 425–39. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.425
32. Hickman K.R., Hartnett D.C. Effects of grazing intensity on growth, reproduction, and abundance of three palatable forbs in Kansans tallgrass prairie. Plant Ecol. 2002: 159: 23-30. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015534721939
33. Gustavo A.M.T., Coffin D.P., Burke I.C. Development of microtopography in a semi،arid grassland: Effects of disturbancr size and soil texture. Plant soil. 1997; 191: 163-171. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1004286605052
34. Milton S.J., Dean W.R.J., DuPlessis M.A., Siegfried W.R. A conceptual model of arid rangeland degradation. Biosci. 1994; 44: 70-76. https://doi.org/10.2307/1312204
35. Archibold O.W. Ecology of world vegetation. Chapman and Hall Inc, London, 1996. 509 p. https://www.worldcat.org/title/ecology-of-world-vegetation/oclc/32079951
36. Teimourzadeh A., Ghorbani A., Kavianpour A.H. Study on the flora, life forms and chorology of the southeastern of Nemin forests (Asi-Gheran, Fandoghloo, Hasani, Bobini) in Ardabil province. Iran. J. Plant Biol. 2016; 28(2): 264-275. (In Persian). https://plant.ijbio.ir/?_action=articleInfo&article=678&lang=en&lang=fa
37. Akbarzadeh M. Flora life form and ecology of plants in region of Vaz Mazandarn. Pazhohesh Sazandegi. 2007; 75: 198-200. (In Persian). https://www.sid.ir/fA/Journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=72202
38. Zhao C.M., Chen W.L., Tian Z.Q., Xie Z.Q. Altitudinal pattern of plant species diversity in Shennongjia Mountain, central China. Integr. Plant Biol. 2005; 47(12): 1431-1449. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7909.2005.00164.x
39. Sohrabi H., Akbarinia. M. Diversity of plant species in relation to physiographic factors on Dehsorkh forest area in Javanroud of Kermanshah province. Iran. J. Forest Poplar Res. 2005; 3(4): 279-293. (In Persian). https://ijfpr.areeo.ac.ir/article_108499.html?lang=fa
40. Dwyer D.D., Buckhous J.C., Huey W.S. Impacts of grazing Intensity and specialized grazing system on the use and value of rangeland: Summary and recommendations. In Natle. Concil/Natle. Sci. Developing strategies for rangeland management. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado. 1984; 867-884. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.1201/9780429049705-34/impacts-grazing-intensity-specialized-grazing-systems-use-value-rangeland-summary-recommendations-donald-dwyer-john-buckhouse-william-huey