Modeling and Prioritizing Ecotourism Potential in National Park and Protected Area of Sarigol with Fuzzy-AHP in GIS

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
A. kalate 1
Z. Ghelichipour 2
E. akbari 3
1 Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Hakim Sabzevari University
2 Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Hakim Sabzevari University
3 Department of Remote sensing and GIS, Faculty of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Hakim Sabzevari University. Sabzevar. Iran. e.akbari@hsu.ac.ir
10.22034/ecopersia.11.2.125
Abstract
Aims: Tourism can significantly contribute to protecting and developing the environment and national parks as essential sites. Ecotourism, one sustainable tourism form, is based on natural attractions. This study aims to identify and prioritize appropriate ecotourism sites in Sarigol National Park and Protected Area.

Methods: To this end, some criteria, including landform, climate, wildlife habitats, vegetation type and density, and soil of the area, were investigated. Elevation, slope, aspect, precitipation, sunny days in month, soil erosion, soil depth, vegetation type, vegetation density, animal type were assessed as sub-criteria, too. The potential ecological map was drawn using the Fuzzy-Analytical Hierarchy Process (Fuzzy-AHP) based on the criteria and sub-criteria. Also, its regional attractiveness map was identified by field investigation with Global Positioning System (GPS) and weighting via a questionnaire and Geographic Information System (GIS), then was compared with the potential ecological map. Finally, appropriate and potential tourism and ecotourism sites were identified.

Findings: The results indicated that northern parts of the area, Izi Waterfall, and some parts of the National Park enjoy capabilities of ecotourism development; these sites enjoy both ecological capabilities and attractions to attract tourists.

Conclusion: Identifying ecotourism sites in the present study contributes to better management, tourism development, and protection of the study area.
Keywords
Potential mapping
Ecotourism
Fuzzy-AHP
GIS
Sarigol National Park

Subjects

1. Zhang, X., Zhong, L., & Yu, H. Sustainability assessment of tourism in protected areas: A relational perspective. GLOBAL ECOL. CONSERV 2022; 35: e02074.https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989422000762.
2. Ceballos-Lascurain, H. Introduction. In Ecotourism: A Guide for Planners and Managers. ECOTOURISM S. 1998; 7-10. https://web.stanford.edu/class/e297c/trade_environment/photo/hlodge.html.
3. Bushell R, Bricker K. Tourism in protected areas: Developing meaningful standards. TOURISM HOS. R. 2017; 17(1): 106-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1467358416636173.
4. Baloch, Q. B., Shah, S. N., Iqbal, N., Sheeraz, M., Asadullah, M., Mahar, S., & Khan, A. U. Impact of tourism development upon environmental sustainability: A suggested framework for sustainable ecotourism. ENVIRON. SCI. POLLUT. R. 2023; 30(3): 5917-5930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22496-w.
5. Newsome, D., & Davies, C. A case study in estimating the area of informal trail development and associated impacts caused by mountain bike activity in John Forrest National Park, Western Australia. J. ECOTOURISM 2009; 8(3): 237–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/14724040802538308.
6. Pickering, C. M., Hill, W., Newsome, D., & Leung, Y. -F. Comparing hiking, mountain biking and horse-riding impacts on vegetation and soils in Australia and the United States of America. J. ENVIRON. MANAGE. 2010; 91(3): 551–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.09.025.
7. Mallikage, S. T., Perera, P., Newsome, D., Bandara, R., & Simpson, G. Effects of recreational camping on the environmental values of national parks in Sri Lanka. TROP. LIFE. SCI. RES. 2021; 32(3): 119. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9132554/.
8. Habibullah, M. S., Din, B. H., Chong, C. W., & Radam, A. A cross-country analysis on the impact of tourism on threatened plant species. PROCEDIA SOC. BEH. SCI. 2016; 224: 14-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.394.
9. Buckley, R. (Ed.). Environmental impacts of ecotourism. Wallingford: CABI. Publishing. 2004. https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/20043135893.
10. Buckley, R. Tourism and environment. ANNU. REV. ENV. RESOUR. 2011; 36: 397–416. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-environ-041210-132637.
11. Trišić, I., Privitera, D., Štetić, S., Genov, G., & Stanić Jovanović, S. Sustainable tourism in protected area—A case of Fruška Gora National Park, Vojvodina (Northern Serbia). SUSTAINABILITY 2022; 14(21): 14548. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114548.
12. Kirkby, C. A., Giudice, R., Day, B., Turner, K., & Soares-Filho, B. S., Oliveira-Rodrigues, H., & Yu, D. W. Closing the ecotourism–conservation loop in the Peruvian Amazon. ENVIRON. CONSERV. 2011; 38(1): 6–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892911000099.
13. Eagles, P. F., McCool, S. F., & Haynes, C. D. Sustainable tourism in protected areas: Guidelines for planning and management. WORLD. COMM. PROTECT. AREA. (WCPA). IUCN. 2002; (8). https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851995892.0000.
14. McNamara, K. E., & Prideaux, B. Planning nature-based hiking trails in a tropical rainforest setting. ASIA. PAC. J. TOUR. RES. 2011; 16 (3): 289–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2011.572665.
15. Quintana, V. M. Eco-cultural tourism: Sustainable development and promotion of natural and cultural heritage. June 2nd. TOURISM 2020; https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.93897 .
16. Zhou, Y., Buesching, C. D., Newman, C., Kaneko, Y., Xie, Z., & Macdonal, D. W. Balancing the benefits of ecotourism and development: The effects of visitor trailuse on mammals in a protected area in rapidly developing China. BIOL. CONSERV. 2013; 165: 18–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.05.007.
17. Sajib, S. M., Nicolli, F., & Alietti, A. Problematizing tourism for conservation: An eco-cultural critique on sustainability. EUR. J. CULT. STUD. MANAG. POLICY. 2022; 1. https://doi.org/10.3389/ejcmp.2022.11094.
18. Beiranvandzade, M., Darvishi, H.A., Sharafi, S., & Alizade, S. D. Zoning appropriate eco-tourism in the city Kuhdasht using GIS. TOURIST STUD. 2012; 1(2): 90-115. (In persian). https://www.magiran.com/paper/1618157.
19. Arrowsmith, C. Modelling Potential for Nature-based Tourism. Nature-based Tourism, Environment and Land Management. CAB. INTER. 2003; 167-179. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851997322.0167.
20. KianiSadr M, Melhosseini Darani K, & Golkarian H. Quantitative zoning of ecotourism potential in Oshtorankouh protected area using Delphi method, analytic hierarchy process, and weighted overlay methods. ECOPERSIA 2019; 7(2): 115-23. https://ecopersia.modares.ac.ir/article-24-18755-en.html.
21. Mousavi, Z. Using multi-criteria analysis in GIS environment for the zoning of Nazhvan Regioin in Isfahan. MSc thesis in Environment, Faculty of fisheries, pasture and environment, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources 2010. (in persian). https://www.virascience.com/thesis/521997/.
22. Motiei Langroudi, H., Nasiri, H., & Azizi, A., Mostafaie, A. Modeling agricultural and rangeland ecological capability of the user perspective using FUZZY AHP in GIS, (Case Study: Marvdasht City). LAND USE PLAN. 2012; 4(6): 101-124. (in persian). https://jtcp.ut.ac.ir/article_28792.html.
23. Sajjadian, M., Barfi, Z. & Ghahremani, M. Ranking and analysis of rural tourism based on river-based ecotourism of Amol using combination of GIS and AHP, data networks and sensitivity analysis. GEOGR. J. CHASHMANDAZ E. ZAGROS 2013; 5(16): 65- 82. (in persian). https://www.sid.ir/FileServer/JF/25813932005.
24. Shojaei, M., Monzavi, M. & Torab Ahmadi, M. Spatial planning of capacity development of ecotourism zones in Qom Province. J. APPL. RES. GEOG. SCI. 2014; 4(33): 154-174. (in persian). https://jgs.khu.ac.ir/article-1-2183-fa.html.
25. Rahayuningsih, T., Muntasib, H., & Budi Prasetyo, L. Nature Based Tourism Resources Assessment Using Geographic Information System (GIS): Case Study in Bogor. PROCEDIA ENVIRON. SCI. 2016; 33: 365-375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2016.03.087.
26. Zabihi, H., Alizadeh, M., Wolf, I. D., Karami, M., Ahmad, A., & Salamian, H. A GIS-based fuzzy-analytic hierarchy process (F-AHP) for ecotourism suitability decision making: A case study of Babol in Iran. TOURISM MANAGE. PERS. 2020; 36: 100726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2020.100726.
27. Bire, C., Kasse, D., & Bire, R. Decision support system for selecting tourist attractions using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. B. ELEC. ENG. INF. 2021; 10(3): 1252-1261. https://beei.org/index.php/EEI/article/view/3032.
28. Wu, C. K., Wang, C. N., & Le, T. K. T. Fuzzy Multi Criteria Decision Making Model for Agritourism Location Selection: A Case Study in Vietnam. AXIOMS 2022; 11(4): 176. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms11040176.
29. Homenda, W., Jastrzebska, A., & Pedrycz, W. Multicriteria decision making inspired by human cognitive processes. APPL. MATH. COMPUT. 2016; 290: 392-411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2016.05.041.
30. Zadeh, L, A. The Concept of a Linguistic Variable and its Application to Approximate Reasoning-I, INFORM. SCIENCES 1975; 8: 199-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0255(75)90036-5.
31. Mammadov, A., & Gurbanov, F. Fuzzy logic of Lutfi zadeh and methodological and epistemo-logical analysis of set theory. SCI. EDU. INN. CONTEXT MOD. PROB. 2022; 5(4): 100- 110. https://philarchive.org/archive/MAMFLO.
32. Ghaed Rahmati, S., Bastanifar, I. & Soltani, L. Studying the effects of crowding on the vulnerability of earthquake in Isfahan (with a fuzzy approach). J. GEOGR. ENVIRON. PLAN. 2011; 42(41): 107-122. (in persian). https://www.sid.ir/paper/362738/fa.
33. Gorsevski, P. V., & Jankowski, P. An optimized solution of multi-criteria evaluation analysis of landslide susceptibility using fuzzy sets and Kalman filter. COMPUT. GEOSCI. 2010; 36: 1005–1020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2010.03.001.
34. Makhdum, M. Foundations of spatial planning. Tehran: UNIVERS. TEHRAN PRESS 2006. (in persian). https://www.adinehbook.com/gp/product/9640340251.
35. Jafari, Z., Mikaeali Tabrizy, A.R., Mohammadzadeh, M., & Abdi, O. Evaluation of ecotourism competen in golestan national park through weighted linear combination method. J. RENEW. NAT. RES. 2012; 2(4 ): 25-37. (In persian). https://www.sid.ir/paper/212304/fa.
36. Ahmadi Sani, N., Babaei Kafaki, S, & Motaji, A. Exploring the possibility of ecotourism activities for ecological Northern Zagros forests via multi-criteria decision-making, GIS and remote sensing. LAND USE J. 2011; 3(4): 45-64. (in persian). https://jtcp.ut.ac.ir/article_23204.html.
37. Salman Mahini, A. Riazi, B., Babak, N., Babaii Kafaki, S., & Javadi Larijani, A. Evaluating ecotourism capacities of Behshar City using GIS. ENVIR. SCI. TECH. 2009; 11(1): 187-198. (in persian). https://www.sid.ir/paper/87124/fa.
38. Domínguez, S., & Carnero, M. C. Fuzzy multicriteria modelling of decision making in the renewal of healthcare technologies. MATHEMATICS 2020; 8(6): 944. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8060944.
39. Eastman, J.R., Kyem, P.A, Toledano, K., & Jin, J. W. GIS and Decision Making, m 1st ed. UNITAR 1993; 108-112. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/290802304_GIS_and_decision_making.
40. Bianchini, S., Solari, L., Del Soldato, M., Raspini, F., Montalti, R., Ciampalini, A., & Casagli, N. Ground subsidence susceptibility (GSS) mapping in Grosseto Plain (Tuscany, Italy) based on satellite InSAR data using frequency ratio and fuzzy logic. REMOTE SENS. BASEL 2019; 11(17): 2015. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11172015.
41. Salari, M., Moazed, H., & Radmanesh, F. Zoning municipal solid waste landfill sites using FUZZY -AHP in GIS (Case Study: Shiraz), TOLOO BEHDASHT 2012; 11(1): 96-109. (in persian). https://www.sid.ir/paper/103067/fa.
42. Koumari, S., Behera, MD. & Tewari, HR., Identification of potential ecotourism sites in west district, Sikkim using geospatial tools. TROP. ECOL. 2010; 51 (1): 75-85. http://scstsenvis.nic.in/WriteReadData/links/potential%20ecotourism%20site%20west%20sikkim-114207307.pdf.