Effective Factors on Runoff Generation and Hydrologic Sensitivity in a Mountainous Watersheds (A Case Study: Farsan Watershed, Upstream of Karoun River)

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
A. Raeisi 1
A. Talebi 1
K. Abdollahi 2
A. Torabi Haghighi 3
1 Watershed Management Department, Natural Resources Faculty, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran
2 Watershed Management Department, Natural Resources Faculty, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran
3 Water Resources & Environmental Engineering Research Department, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
Abstract
Aims: Affecting factors on runoff generation in mountainous areas, where the hydrological processes are complex, play an important role in the recognition of hydrological phenomena. The aim of the present study was to simulate the water balance of Farsan Basin using the SWAT model.

Materials & Methods: In this semi-distributed research, SWAT model was used to simulate the monthly runoff the basin of interest. The study area was Farsan watershed, it is the part of Beheshtabad Basin. Basin's curve number was estimated using a remotely sensed NDVI. The calibration and validation of the model were carried out by using the SUFI2 Algorithm (sequential uncertainty fitting) for two periods, one from 2001 to 2011 and another from 2012 to 2015.

Findings: The threshold depth of water in the shallow aquifer to start evaporation (REVAPMN) had the least sensitivity, while the soil evapotranspiration (ESCO), the time delay of the transferring water from the last soil profile to the groundwater level (GW_DELAY), and curve numbers in normal condition (CN2) were the most sensitive factors, respectively. To evaluate the simulation, R2 (coefficient of determination), bR2 (weight correlation coefficient), and NS (Nash Sutcliffe model efficiency) at the calibration stage were 0.63, 0.33, and 0.57, respectively. Whereas at the validation phase, these coefficients were found to be 0.69, 0.68, and 0.52, respectively.

Conclusion: A proper specification of these sensitive parameters may be the key factor for runoff simulations. The impact of change in surface parameters may have a great influence in both generating runoff and mountain hydrology.
Keywords
Hydrological Modeling
SWAT
SUFI2 Algorithm

Subjects

References
1- Guzha A, Hardy T. Application of the Distributed Hydrological Model, TOPNET, to the big darbyCreekbasin, Ohio, USA, Water Res. Manage. 2010; 24: 979-1003.
2- Noor H, Vafakhah M, Taheriyoun M, Moghadasi M. Hydrology modelling in Taleghan mountainous watershed using SWAT. J. Water. Land Dev. 2014 a; 20(1): 11-18.
3- Noor H, Vafakhah M, Taheriyoun, M, Moghaddasi M. Comparison of single-site and multi-site based calibrations of SWAT in Taleghan Watershed, Iran. In. J. Eng. 2014 b; 27(11): 1645-1652.
4- Mahzari S, Kiani F, Azimi M, Khormali F, Using SWAT Model to Determine Runoff, Sediment Yield and Nitrate Loss in Gorganrood Watershed, Iran. ECOPERSIA; 2016, 4 (2): 1359-1377.
5- Shimelis G, Dargahi D, Srinivasan R. Modeling of sediment yield from Anjeni-Gauged basin, Ethiopia using SWAT model. J. A. Water Res. Associate. 2010; Vol. 46, No. 3.
6- Hosseini M, Ghafouri M, Tabatabaei MR, Ebrahimi NG, Zare Garizi A, Estimation of Hydrologic Budget for Gharasou Watershed, Iran. ECOPERSIA. 2016; 4(3), 1455-1469.
7- Jiang R, Wang Y, Li Q. Modeling the water balance processes for underestanding the components of river discharge in a non‐conservative basin. J. Trans. ASABE, 2011; (54): 2171-2180, Romagnolia.
8- Murty P, Pandey A, Suryavanshi P. Application of semi-distributed hydrological model for basin level water balance of the Ken basin of Central India. Hydrol. Process, 2014; 28 (13): 4119-4129.
9- Feyereisen G, Strickland T, Bosch D. Evaluation of SWAT manual calibration and input parameter sensitivity in the Little river basin. Am. Soc. Agri. Bio. Eng. 2007; (50): 843−855.
10- Xu Z, Pang J, Liu C. Assessment of runoff and sediment yield in the Miyun Reservoir catchment by using SWAT model. Hydrol. Process. 2009; 23: 3619–3630.
11- Grusson Y, Sun X, Gascoin S. Assessing the capability of the SWAT model to simulate snow, snow melt and streamflow dynamics over an alpine watershed locatSáchez-Pérez, J. Hydrol. 2015; 531:574-588.
12- Lu Z, Zou S, Xiao H. Comprehensive hydrologic calibration of SWAT and water balance analysis in mountainous watersheds in northwest China, Physic. Chem. Earth. 2015; 79–82: 76–85.
13- Romagnoli M, Portapila M, Rigalli A. Assessment of the SWAT model to simulate a watershed with limited available data in the Pampas region, Argentina. Sci. Total Environ. 2017; 596-597: 437–450.
14- Deng P, Zhang M, Bing J, Jia J, Zhang D. Evaluation of the GSMaP_Gauge products using rain gauge observations and SWAT model in the Upper Hanjiang River Basin. Atmos. Res. 2019; 219: 153-165.
15- Nguyen HH, Recknagel F, Meyer W, Frizenschaf J, Ying H, Gibbs M S. Comparison of the alternative models SOURCE and SWAT for predicting catchment streamflow, sediment and nutrient loads under the effect of land use changes. Sci. Total Environ. 2019; 662(20): 254-265.
16- Jodar-Abellan A, Valdes-Abellan J, Pla C, Gomariz-Castillo F. Impact of land use changes on flash flood prediction using a sub-daily SWAT model in five Mediterranean ungauged watersheds (SE Spain). Sci. Total Environ. 2019; 657: 1578-1591.
17- Sarreshtehdari A, Ghafouri M, Jafari Ardakani A, Bayat R, Reliability of Land Capability Map in Watershed Hydrological Simulation Using Swat Model. ECOPERSIA. 2014; 2(3): 715-725.
18- Neitsch S, Arnold J, Kiniry J. SWAT Theoretical Documentation Version, Soil and Water Research Laboratory. 2005; ARS, Temple Texas, USA.
19- Fan F, Deng Y, Hu X. Estimating Composite Curve Number Using an Improved SCS-CN Method with Remotely Sensed Variables in Guangzhou, China.,Remote Sens. 2013; ( 5), 1425-1438; doi:10.3390/rs5031425.
20- Ndomba PM, Birhanu BZ. Problems and Prospects of SWAT Model Applications in NILOTIC Catchments, Nile Basin. Water Eng. Sci. Mag. 2008; 1.
21- Stellman K,Fuelberg H, Garza R. An Examination of radar and rain gauge derived mean areal precipitation over Georgia Basins, Weather Forcast. 2001; 16:133-144.
22- Birhanu B, Ndomba PM, MtaloFW. Aplication of SWAT model for mountainous catchment. J. Water. Arba Minch. 2007; 30:182-187.
23- Rostamian R, Jaleh A, Afyuni M. Application of a SWAT model for estimating runoff and sediment in two mountainous basins in central Iran. Hydrol. Sci. 2008; (53): 977-988: 41-52.
24- TomLotz T, Opp C and X He X. Factors of runoff generation in the Dongting Lake basin based on a SWAT model and implications of recent land cover change, Quaternary International. 2018; 475, 54-62.