Linkages of Litter and Soil Carbon, Nitrogen and Phosphorus Stoichiometry in a Temperate Broad -Leaved Forest Stand

Authors
S. M. Hosseini 1
B. Samadzadeh 2
Y. Kooch 3
1 Professor of Forestry, Faculty of Natural Resources and Marine Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Noor, Mazandaran, Iran
2 M.Sc. of Forestry, Faculty of Natural Resources and Marine Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Noor, Mazandaran, Iran
3 Assisstant Professor of Forestry, Faculty of Natural Resources and Marine Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Noor, Mazandaran, Iran
Abstract
Background: Measures of nutrient availability such as concentrations of carbon (C), nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) are important indicators of terrestrial ecosystems productivity. Current research illustrates the C, N and P stoichiometry of litter and soil in a coastal mixed forest stand, northern Iran.
Materials and Methods: To this, the Carpinus betulus (CB), Acer velutinum (AV), Pterocarya fraxinifolia (PF), Quercus castaneifolia (QC) species were considered; litter and soil (0-15cm depth) samples were taken under tree canopy cover.
Results: Litter and soil C: N ratio differed among the tree species, showing the highest (61.08 and 31.44) and lowest (21.90 and 3.59) under the QC and CB tree species, respectively. The litter and soil C: P ratio varied among the study sites and ranked in order of QC (52.4 and 27227.04) > PF (30 and 1465.61) > AV (15.74 and 630.54) ≈ CB (13.42 and 566.28). The higher amounts of litter N: P ratio were significantly found under QC (0.86) > PF (0.73) > CB (0.61) ≈ AV (0.55), whereas soil N: P ratio were significantly higher under CB (177.69) > PF (123.53) ≈ AV (121.60) > QC (109.25), respectively.
Conclusion: We found the species that differed in traits could influence C, N and P dynamics and its stoichiometry. The Q. castaneifolia species with different root traits that resulted in different vertical and horizontal distributions of C, N and P, reflecting differences in nutrient uptake by plants and microbial dynamics, drove the biggest changes in litter and soil C, N and P.
Keywords
Carbon
Ecological stoichiometry
Nitrogen
Phosphorus
Tree species
Mol G, Keesstra SD. Editorial: Soil science in a changing world. Opinions in Environmental Sustainability; 4: 473-477.
2. Keesstra S, Pereira P, Novara A, Brevik EC, Azorin-Molina C, Parras-Alcántara L, et al. Effects of Soil Management Techniques on Soil Water Erosion in Apricot Orchards. Sci Total Environ. 2016; 551-552: 357-366.
3. Bardgett RD, Bowman WD, Kaufmann R, Schmidt SK. A temporal approach to linking aboveground and belowground ecology. Trends Ecol Evol. 2005; 20: 634-641.
4. Kooch Y, Theodose TA, Samonil P. The role of deforestation on spatial variability of soil nutrients in a Hyrcanian forest: an analysis of fractal and geostatistic. Ecopersia, 2014; 2: 779-803.
5. Kooch Y, Rostayee F, Hosseini SM. Soil quality indices in pure and mixed forest stands of southern Caspian region. Ecopersia, 2015; 3: 987-1001.
6. Bardgett RDW. Aboveground-belowground linkages biotic interactions, ecosystem processes, and global change. 2010; (No. 574-524 B37).
7. Hume A, Chen HY, Taylor AR, Kayahara GJ, Man R. Soil C: N: P dynamics during secondary succession following fire in the boreal forest of central Canada. For Ecol Manag. 2016; 369: 1-9.
8. Batjes NH. Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world. European J Soil Sci. 2014; 65: 10-21.
9. King JY, Mosier AR, Morgan JA, LeCain DR, Milchunas DG, Parton WJ. Plant nitrogen dynamics in shortgrass steppe under elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide. Ecosystems. 2004; 7: 147-160.
10. Sterner RW, Elser JJ. Ecological stoichiometry: the biology of elements from molecules to the biosphere. Princeton University Press. 2002.
11. Novara A, Rühl J, La Mantia T, Gristina L, La Bella S, Tuttolomondo T. Litter contribution to soil organic carbon in the processes of agriculture abandon. Solid Earth. 2015; 6: 425-432.
12. Rodrigo Comino J, Iserloh T, Lassu T, Cerdà A, Keesstra SD, Prosdocimi M, Brings C, Marzen M, Ramos MC, Senciales JM, Ruiz Sinoga JD, Seeger M, Ries JB. Quantitative comparison of initial soil erosion processes and runoff generation in Spanish and German Vineyards. Sci Total Environ. 2016; 565: 1165-1174.
13. Kuzyakov Y, Domanski G. Carbon input by plants into the soil. Review J Plant Nut Soil Sci. 2000; 163: 421-431.
14. Baribault TW, Kobe RK, Rothstein DE. Soil calcium, nitrogen, and water are correlated with aboveground net primary production in northern hardwood forests. For Ecol Manag. 2010; 260: 723-733.
15. Hobbie SE, Reich PB, Oleksyn J, Ogdahl M, Zytkowiak R, Hale C, et al. Tree species effects on decomposition and forest floor dynamics in a common garden. Ecology. 2006; 87: 2288-2297.
16. Wang H, Liu S, Wang J, Shi Z, Lu L, Zeng J, et al. Effects of tree species mixture on soil organic carbon stocks and greenhouse gas fluxes in subtropical plantations in China. For Ecol Manag. 2013; 300: 4-13.
17. Ushio M, Kitayama K, Balser TC. Tree species effects on soil enzyme activities through effects on soil physicochemical and microbial properties in a tropical montane forest on Mt. Kinabalu, Borneo. Pedobiologia. 2010; 53: 227-233.
18. Adamczyk B, Kilpeläinen P, Kitunen V, Smolander A. Potential activities of enzymes involved in N, C, P and S cycling in boreal forest soil under different tree species. Pedobiologia. 2014; 57: 97-102.
19. Guendehou GS, Liski J, Tuomi M, Moudachirou M, Sinsin B, Makipaa R. Decomposition and changes in chemical composition of leaf litter of five dominant tree species in a West African tropical forest. Trop Ecol. 2014; 55: 207-220.
20. Gartzia-Bengoetxea N, Kandeler E, de Arano IM, Arias-González A. Soil microbial functional activity is governed by a combination of tree species composition and soil properties in temperate forests. Appl Soil Ecol. 2016; 100: 57-64.
21. Neirynck J, Mirtcheva S, Sioen G, Lust N. Impact of Tilia platyphyllos Scop., Fraxinus excelsior L., Acer pseudoplatanus L., Quercus robur L. and Fagus sylvatica L. on earthworm biomass and physico-chemical properties of a loamy topsoil. For Ecol Manag. 2000; 133: 275-286.
22. Sagheb-Talebi K, Sajedi T, Pourhashemi M. Forests of Iran: A Treasure from the Past, a Hope for the Future. Springer Verlag. 2014; 15-65.
23. Adel MN, Pourbabaei H, Dey DC. Ecological species group-Environmental factors relationships in unharvested beech forests in the north of Iran. Ecol Eng. 2014; 69: 1-7.
24. Waez-Mousavi SM, Habashi H. Evaluating humus forms variation in an unmanaged mixed beech forest using two different classification methods. IForest. 2012; 5: 272.
25. Sluiter R, Smit N. Gap size effect on microclimate and soil moisture. In: “Forest filled with gaps. Effects of gap size on water and nutrient cycling in tropical rain forest. A Study in Guyana” (Van Dam O ed). Ph.D. Thesis, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands. 2001; 208.
26. Mirzaei J, Tabari M, Daroodi H. Early growth of Quercus castaneifolia (C.A. Meyer) seedlings as affected by weeding, shading and irrigation. Pakistan J Biol Sci. 2007; 10: 2430 - 2435.
27. Allison LE. Organic carbon. In: Black, C.A. (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI. 1975; 1367-1378.
28. Bremner JM, Mulvaney CS. Nitrogen-total. In: Page, A.L., Miller, R.H., Keeney, R.R. (Eds.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2, Second ed. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI. 1982; 595-624.
29. Homer DC, Pratt PF. Methods of analysis for soils, plants and waters. Univ. of California, Div Agri Sci. USA. 1961; 150-196.
30. Quested HM, Cornelissen JHC, Press MC, Callaghan TV, Aerts R, Trosien F, et al. Decomposition of sub-arctic plants with differing nitrogen economies: a functional role for hemiparasites. Ecology. 2003; 84: 3209-3221.
31. Cornelissen JHC, Quested HM, Gwynn Jones D, Van Logtestijn RSP, De Beus MAH, Kondratchuk A, et al. Leaf digestibility and litter decomposability are related in a wide range of subarctic plant species and types. Funct Ecol. 2004; 18: 779-786.
32. Keller AB, Reed SC, Townsend AR, Cleveland CC. Effects of canopy tree species on belowground biogeochemistry in a lowland wet tropical forest. Soil Biol Biochem. 2013; 58: 61-69.
33. Van Nevel L, Mertens J, De Schrijver A, De Neve S, Verheyen K. Can shrub species with higher litter quality mitigate soil acidification in pine and oak forests on poor sandy soils?. For Ecol Manag. 2014; 330: 38-45.
34. Williams RJ, Hallgren SW, Wilson GW. Frequency of prescribed burning in an upland oak forest determines soil and litter properties and alters the soil microbial community. For Ecol Manag. 2012; 265: 241-247.
35. Benham SE, Vanguelova EI, Pitman RM. Short and long term changes in carbon, nitrogen and acidity in the forest soils under oak at the Alice Holt Environmental Change Network site. Science of The Total Environment. 2012; 421: 82-93.
36. Kooijman AM, Smit A. Paradoxical differences in N-dynamics between Luxembourg soils: litter quality or parent material?. Eur J For Res. 2009; 128: 555-565.
37. Chiti T, Certini G, Puglisi A, Sanesi G, Capperucci A, Forte C. Effects of associating a N-fixer species to monotypic oak plantations on the quantity and quality of organic matter in minesoils. Geoderma. 2007; 138: 162-169.
38. Trinsoutrot I, Recous S, Bentz B, Line`res M, Che`neby D, Nicolardot B. Biochemical quality of crop residues and C and N mineralization under nonlimiting N conditions. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2000; 64: 918-926.
39. Mungai NW, Motavalli PP. Litter quality effects on soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics in temperate alley cropping systems. Appl Soil Ecol. 2006; 31: 32-42.
40. Yang Y, Fang J, Ji C, Datta A, Li P, Ma W, Smith P. Stoichiometric shifts in surface soils over broad geographical scales: evidence from China's grasslands. Global Ecol Biogeog. 2014; 23: 947-955.
41. Kooch Y, Hosseini SM, Scharenbroch BC, Hojjati SM, Mohammadi J. Pedodiversity in the Caspian forests of Iran. Geoderma Regional. 2015; 5: 4-14.
42. Kooijman AM, Martinez-Hernandez GB. Effects of litter quality and parent material on organic matter characteristics and N-dynamics in Luxembourg beech and hornbeam forests. For Ecol Manag. 2009; 257: 1732-1739.
43. Aubert M, Hedde M, Decaens T, Bureau F, Margerie P, Alard D. Effects of tree canopy composition on earthworms and other macro-invertebrates in beech forests of Upper Normandy (France). Pedobiologia. 2003; 47: 904-912.
44. Giardina CP, Ryan MG, Hubbard RM, Binkley D. Tree species and soil textural controls on carbon and nitrogen mineralization rates. Soil Sci Soc Amer J. 2001; 65: 1272-1279.
45. Gradowski T, Thomas SC. Responses of Acer saccharum canopy trees and saplings to P, K and lime additions under high N deposition. Tree Phys. 2008; 28: 173-185.
ECOPERSIA
Volume 5, Issue 4 - Serial Number 22
December 2017
Pages 1955-1967