Variation of Carbon Sequestration in Halocnemum strobilaceum and Soil under Livestock Grazing (Case Study: Salt Lands of Golestan Province, Iran)

Authors
1 Young Researchers and Elites Club, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant professor, Department of Range and Watershed Management, Faculty of Natural Resources, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran
3 Ph.D. Student, Department of Rangeland Management, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran
Abstract
Background: Grazing intensity has a major effect on soil and biomass organic carbon storage (C). Various plants and ecosytems with deiffernt charactristices have their unique responses to the grazing. Recognizing the effects of grazing intensity on C in various envrionments dominated by Halocnemum strobilaceum, such as Incheboron salt land of Golestan province, helps plannig the grazing startegies.
Materials and Methods: Three grazing sites, viz. heavy grazing (in vicinity of resting point), moderate grazing (at a distance of 650 meters from resting point) and light grazing (at a distance of 2050 meters from resting point) were selceted. Sampling of soil and H. strobilaceum species was carried out with systematic-random method in Nov. 2012. In this regard, fifteen plants along the five 100 meters transects (with distance of 30m) were randomly selected and underground and abovegrond organs were extracted. The amount of biomass C was determined by combustion method. Also, soil sampling with five repetation was carried out in two depths (0-20 cm and 20-40 cm) and the amount of stored C was determined by Walkly and Black method.
Results: The sum of underground and aboveground biomass C in light grazing site was more than the heavy and moderate grazing sites, which were about 1.17, 1.07 and 0.567 ton/hectare respectively. The amount of soil C for the mentioned sites were 162.56, 137,39 and 80.76 ton/hectare, respectively. Besides, the depth 0-20 cm in all sites had a higher C. The soil C comprised more than 99 percent of ecosystem total stored C (biomas and soil C) in each site. In terms of total ecosystem C, the heavy and moderate grazing site had about 84.37 and 32.20 ton/hectare less C compred to light grazing site.
Conclusions: From a management perspective, it is concluded that light grazing intesity in saltalnd region can lead to maintenance of C in high level and grazing systems should avoid high stocking rates because it may adversely affect soil C. Heavy grazing has more negative effects on C compared to moderate grazing. Both soil and biomass respond similarly to different grazing intensities. The soil, especially first depth as the main resourcse of C, should be protected from detrioration to prevent C decling. In view point of C sequestration, it is suggested to plan grazing intesity in light level and protect the soil of rangelands.the five 100 meters transects (with distance of 30m) were selected and underground and abovegrond organs were extracted. The amount of biomass C was determined by combustion method. Also, soil sampling with five repetation was carried out on two depths (0-20 cm and 20-40 cm) and the amount of stored C was determined by Walkly and Black method. The results showed that the sum of underground and aboveground biomass C in light grazing site is more than the heavy and moderate grazing sites. This value is about 1.17, 1.07 and 0.567 ton/hectare for light, moderate and heavy grazing, respectively. The amount of soil C for the
and soil C) in each of sites.
Keywords

  1. Frank AB, Liebig MA, Hanson JD. Soil carbon dioxide fluxes in northern semiarid grasslands, Soil Biol Biochem. 2002; 34 (9): 1235-1241.

  2. William E. Carbon dioxide fluxes in a semi-arid environment with high carbonate soil, Agriculture and Forest. Meteorology. 2002; 116: 91-102.

  3. Henderson DC, Ellert BH, Naeth MA. Grazing and soil carbon along a gradient of Albetra rangelands, J Range Manage. 2004; 57: 402-410.

  4. Bardgett RD, Freeman C, Ostle NJ. Microbial contributionsto climate change through carbon cycle feedbacks. The ISME Journal. 2008;  2(8): 805-814.

  5. Dungait JAJ, Bol R, Evershed RP. Quantification of dung carbon incorporation in a temperate grassland soil following spring application using bulk stable carbon isotope determinations. Isot Environ Healt S. 2005; 41: 3-11.

  6. Conant RT, Paustian K, Elliott ET. Grassland management and conversion into grassland: effects on soil carbon. Ecol Appl. 2001; 11: 343-355.

  7. Binkley D, Singer F, Kaye M, Rochelle R. Influence of elk grazing on soil properties in Rocky Mountain, National Park, J Forest Ecol Manage. 2003; 185 (3): 239-47.

  8. Phoenix G K, Johnson D, Grime JP, Booth RE. Sustaining eco system services in ancient limestone grassland: importance of major component plants and community composition. J Ecol. 2008; 96(5):894-902.

  9. Smit A, Kooijman AM. Impact of grazing on the input of organic matter and nutrients to the soil in a grass-encroached Scots pine forest. Forest Ecol Manage. 2001; 142: 99-107.

  10. Arzani H, Azarnivand H, Mehrabi AA, Nikkhah A, Fazel Dehkordi L. The minimum rangeland area required for pastoralism in Semnan province. Pajouhesh and Sazandegi, Ir. J. 2007; 74: 107-113. (In Persian).

  11. Smith P, Martion D, Cai Z, Gwary D, Janzen HH, Kumar P. Greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 2008; 363: 789-813.

  12. Menezes RSC, Elliott ET, Valentine DW, Williams SA. Carbon and nitrogen dynamics in elk winter ranges, J Range Manage. 2001; 54: 400-408.

  13. Attaeian B, Estimation of Aboveground Biomass Carbon Sequestration Potential in the Rangeland Ecosystems of Iran. Ecopersia. 2016; 4(1): 1283-1294.

  14. Motamedi J, Sheidai Karkaj E, Alilou F. Variation in biomass and morphology of Artemisia fragransWilld. Under grazing in northwest mountainous rangelands of Iran. Acta Ecologica Sinica. 2016; 36: 477-482.

  15. Xie YZ, Wittig R. The impact of grazing intensity on soil characteristics of Stipa grandis and Stipa bungeana steppe in northern China autonomous region of Ningxia. Acta Oecol. 2004; 25: 197-204.

  16. Tavakoli H. Potential of Carbon Sequestration of Hammada salicornica Vegetation Type in Desert Areas (Case Study: South Khorasan, Iran), J Range Sci. 2016; 6: 24-32.

  17. Khatirnamani J. The effect of Atriplex tillage on soil rangeland in Golestan province. J Range Desert Res. 2005; 12 (3): 311-334. (In Persian).

  18. Niknahad Gharmakher H, Jafari Foutami I, Sharifi A. Effects of Grazing Exclusion on Plant Productivity and Carbon Sequestration (Case Study: Gomishan Rangelands, Golestan Province, Iran), J Range Sci. 2015; 5: 122-134.

  19. Heshmati GA, Sirusi H. Sheidai Karkaj E. Choosing the best mathematical model to study the rangeland ecosystem changes along grazing gradient (Case study: Rangelands of Gorgan plain). Research Report, Vice Presidency for Research and Technology, Gorgan University of Agricultural sciences and natural resources. 2015; No. 92-314- 97: p. 66. (In Persian).

  20. Jankanlou, 2011. Studying the effects of grazing intensity on vegetation root depth in Rangeland soils (a case study: region Incheh Boroun). M.Sc. thesis in rangeland management, Gorgan University of Agricultural sciences and natural resources. p. 78.

  21. Ferguson D F, Carbon Sequestration on Idaho Agriculture and Forest lands. Technical Report of Idaho Soil Conservation Commission. 2003; 30- 35.

  22. Deng L, Sweeney S, Shangguan ZP. Long-term effects of natural enclosure: carbon stocks, sequestration rates and potential for grassland ecosystems in the Loess Plateau. CLEAN–Soil, Air, Water. 2013; 42(5): 617-625.

  23. Fang S, Xue J, Tang L. Biomass production and carbon sequestration potential in poplar plantations with different management patterns. J Environ Manage. 2007; 85: 672- 679.

  24. Su-Yong Z, Zhao HL. Influences of grazing and enclosure on carbon sequestration in degraded sandy grassland. Inner Mongolia, north China, New Zeal. J Agr Res. 2003; 46(4): 321-328.

  25. Guodong H, Xiying H, Mengli Z, Mingjun W. Effect of grazing intensity on carbon and nitrogen in soil and vegetation in a meadow steppe in Inner Mongolia. J Agri Eco Enviro. 2008; 125: 21-32.

  26. Li Ch, Hao X, Zhao M, Han G, Willms WD. Influence of historic sheep grazing on vegetation and soil properties of a Desert Steppe in Inner Mongolia, Agriculture, Ecosys Enviro. 2008; 128: 109-116.

  27. Sheidai Karkaj E. Assessment of carbon sequestration potential of the reclamation species Agropyron elongatum and Atriplex lentiformis (case study: Chapar ghoimeh Gonbad). M.Sc. thesis, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources. 2011; 86 P. (In Persian).

  28. Niknahad Gharmakher H, Sheidai Karkaj E. Jafari, I. Effects of Exclosure on Soil Properties in Winter Rangelands in Golestan Province, Iran. J Rang Sci. 2017; 7(1): 55-66.        

  29. Joneidi Jafari H, Azarnivand H, Jafari M. Study of aboveground and below ground biomass of Artemisia sieberi shrub lands with different grazing intensities in Semnan /province-Iran, Watershed Management Research (Pajouhesh & Sazandegi). 2011; 77: 141-147. (In Persian).

  30. Gao YH, Luo P, Wu N, Chen H, Wang GX. Grazing Intensity Impacts on Carbon Sequestration in an Alpine Meadow on the Eastern Tibetan Plateau. Res J Agri Bio Sci. 2007; 3(6): 642-647.

  31. Schenk HJ, Jackson RB. Rooting depths lateral root spreads and below-ground/aboveground allometries of plants in water-limited ecosystems. J Ecol. 2002; 90: 480-494.

  32. Eccard JA, Meyer J, Sundell J. Space use, circadian activity pattern, and mating system of the nocturnal tree rat Thallomys nigricauda, J Mammal. 2004; 85: 440-445.

  33. Naseri S, Tavakoli H, Jafari M, Arzani H. Impacts of Rangeland Reclamation and Management on Carbon Stock in North East of Iran (Case Study: Kardeh Basin, Mashhad, Iran), J Range Sci. 2016; 6: 320-333.

  34. Khosravi Moshizi A, Heshmati GA, Salman Mahini AR. Identifying Carbon Sequestration Hotspots in Semiarid Rangelands (Case Study: Baghbazm Region of Bardsir City, Kerman Province), J Range Sci. 2015; 5: 325-335.

  35. Nikbole NB, Ojima DS. Changes in plant functional groups, litter quality, and soil carbon and nitrogen mineralization with sheep grazing in Inner Mongolian grassland, J Range Manage. 2004; 57: 613-619.