Development of a Web GIS System Based on the MaxEnt Approach for Wildfire Management: A Case Study of East Azerbaijan

Authors
1 Former Master Student, Department of Remote Sensing and GIS, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
2 Professor, Department of Remote Sensing and GIS, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran and Professor, Department of Environmental Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney NSW 2109, Australia
3 Professor, Department of Remote Sensing and GIS, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
Abstract
Background:The online and efficient information about the spatial distribution of wildfire susceptibility and occurrence has a major role in improving of fire prevention activities.
Materials and Methods: In this study a maximum entropy (MaxEnt) approach was used for modeling wildfire susceptibility in East Azerbaijan Province and a webGIS system called fire susceptibility webGIS system (FSWS) was developed to easily share and utilize data and facilities among local people and managers. The methodology was composed of three different phases. First, dependent and independent variables were produced by several methods includingimage processing technique, interpolation method and GIS analysis. Next, the wildfire susceptibility was analyzed by using a MaxEnt approach to predict the possibility of wildfire occurrence based on history of wildfire data and environmental variables (anthropogenic, topography, climate and vegetation datasets) during 2005–2015 and the model performs well in terms of accuracy, with an area under ROC curve (AUC) value of 0.909. Finally, the webGIS system was developed by up to date and proper information.
Results: This webGIS system was provided from the spatial database of variables, wildfire susceptibility map, fire occurrence layers and base maps. FSWS was set up based on ArcGIS component and provided the facilities and capabilities of a web application that would be used by any user even without any prior knowledge of the GIS field.
Conclusions: By FSWS, the environmental authorities will be able to design many operational plans to control the wildfires, supporting conservation managers in improving pre-fire management and raise the awareness among the local people.
Keywords

  1. Zaksek M, Arvai JL. Toward improved communication about wildfire: mental models research to identidy information needs for natural resource management. Risk Anal, 2004; 24(6): 1503-1514.

  2. Massada A, Syphard AD, Stewart S. Wildfire ignition-distribution modelling: a comparative study in the Huron e Manistee National Forest. Int J Wildfire. 2012; 22(2): 174-183.

  3. Parisien MA, Moritz MA. Environmental controls on the distribution of wildfire at multiple spatial scales. Ecol Monogr. 2009; 79(1): 127-154.

  4. Littell JS, McKenzie D, Peterson DL, Westerling AL. Climate and wildfire area burned in western US ecoprovinces, 1916-2003. Ecol Appl. 2009; 19: 1003-1021.

  5. Ariapour A, Shariff ARBM. Rangeland Fire Risk Zonation using Remote Sensing and Geographical Information System Technologies in Boroujerd Rangelands, Lorestan Province, Iran. ECOPERSIA, 2014; 2(4): 805-818.

  6. Syphard AD, Radeloff VC, Hawbaker TJ, Stewart SI. Conservation threats due to human-caused increases in fire frequency in Mediterranean-climate ecosystems. Conserv. Biol., 2009; 23(3): 758-769.

  7. Parisien MA, Snetsinger S, Greenberg J, Nelson C, Schoennagel T, Dobrowski S. et al. Spatial variability in wildfire probability across the western United States. Int. J. Wildfire., 2012; 21: 313-327.

  8. Hosseini A, Esmaeili Sharif M, Amoozad M, Shirani K, Gorgandipour M. The Effect of Forest Road Distance on Forest Fire Severity (Case Study: Fires in the Neka County Forestry). ECOPERSIA. 2016; 4(2): 1331-1342.

  9. Chuvieco E, Aguado I, Yebra M, Nieto H, Salas J, Martín MP. Development of a framework for fire risk assessment using remote sensing and geographic information system technologies. Ecol Model. 2010; 221: 46-58.

  10. Oliveira S, Oehler F, San-Miguel-Ayanz J, Camia A, Pereira JM. Modeling spatial patterns of fire occurrence in Mediterranean Europe using Multiple Regression and Random Fores. Forest Ecol Manag. 2012; 275: 117-129.

  11. Ferrarini A. Why not use niche modelling for computing risk of wildfire ignition and spreading?. Environmental Skeptics and Critics., 2012; 1(4): 56-60.

  12. Renard Q, Pélissier R, Ramesh BR, Kodandapani N. Environmental susceptibility model for predicting forest fire occurrence in the Western Ghats of India. Int J Wildland Fire., 2012; 21: 368-379.

  13. Arpaci A, Malowerschnig B, Sass O, Vacik H. Using multi variate data mining techniques for estimating fire susceptibility of Tyrolean forests. Appl Geogr, 2014; 53: 258-270.

  14. Fu P, Sun J. Web GIS: principles and applications. Esri Press. 2010; 310 P.

  15. Friis-Christensen A, Bernard L, Kanellopoulos L, Nogueras-Iso J, Peedell S, Schade S, Thorne C. Building service oriented applications on top of a spatial data infrastructure — a forest fire assessment example. 9th AGILE International Conference — Shaping the Future of Geographic Information Science in Europe, 2006; 19-127.

  16. Athanasis N, Kalabokidis K, Vaitis M, Soulakellis N. Towards a semantics-based approach in the development of geographic portals. Comput Geosci, 2009; 35: 301-308.

  17. Kalabokidis K, Xanthopoulos G, Moore P, Caballero D, Kallos G, Llorens J, Vasilakos C. Decision support system for forest fire protection in the Euro-Mediterranean region. European Journal of Forest Research. 2012; 131: 597-608.

  18. Zarghami M, Abdi A, Babaeian I, Hassanzadeh Y, Kanani R. Impacts of climate change on runoffs in East Azerbaijan, Iran. Global Planet Change. 2011; 78: 137-146.

  19. Deblauwe V, Barbier N, Couteron P. The global biogeography of semiarid periodic vegetation patterns. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 2008; 17: 715-723.

  20. Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Model, 2006; 190: 231-259.

  21. Moreno R, Zamora R, Molina JR, Vasquez A, Herrera MA. Predictive modeling of microhabitats for endemic birds in South Chilean temperate forests using maximum entropy (maxent). Ecol Infor, 2011; 6: 364-370.

  22. Phillips SJ, Dudik M. Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: New extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography. 2008; 31: 161-175.

  23. Maeda EE, Arcoverde GF, Pellikka PK, Shimabukuro YE. Fire risk assessment in the brazilian amazon using modis imagery and change vector analysis. Appl Geogr. 2011; 31: 76-84.

  24. Adab H, Kanniah KD, Solaimani K. Modeling forest fire risk in the northeast of iran usingremote sensing and gis techniques. Nat Hazards, 2013; 65: 1723-1743.

  25. Eskandari S, Chuvieco E. Fire danger assessment in Iran based on geospatial information. Int J Appl Earth Observ Geoinf., 2015; 42: 57-64.

  26. Giglio L, Descloitres J, Justice CO, Kaufman YJ. An enhanced contextual fire detection algorithm for MODIS. Remote Sens Environ. 2003; 87: 273-282.

  27. Wu T, Li Y. Spatial interpolation of temperature in the United States using residual kriging. Appl Geogr, 2013;44: 112-120.

  28. Chen FW, Liu CW. Estimation of the spatial rainfall distribution using inverse distance weighting (IDW) in the middle of Taiwan. Paddy Water Environ. 2012;10(3): 209-222.

  29. Shao Y, Lunetta RS. Comparison of support vector machine, neural network, and CART algorithms for the land-cover classification using limited training data points. ISPRS J Photogramm. 2012; 70: 78-87.

  30. Chuvieco E, Cocero D, Riano D, Martin P, Martınez-Vega J, de la Riva J, Pérez F. Combining NDVI and surface temperature for the estimation of live fuel moisture content in forest fire danger rating. Remote Sens Environ. 2004; 92(3): 322-331.

  31. Chang Y, Zhu Z, Bu R, Li Y, Hu Y. Environmental controls on the characteristics of mean number of forest fires and mean forest area burned (1987-2007) in China. Forest Ecol Manag, 2015; 356: 13-21.

  32. Kowal KC. Tapping the web for GIS and mapping technologies: for all levels of libraries and users. Information Technologies and Libraries. 2002; 21: 109-114.

  33. Peng ZR, Tsou MH. Internet GIS: distributed geographic information services for the internet and wireless networks. John Wiley and Sons. 2003; p. 720.

  34. Park, NW. Using maximum entropy modeling for landslide susceptibility mapping with multiple geoenvironmental data sets. Environ Earth Sci. 2015; 73(3): 937-949.

  35. Eastman JR. IDRISI Kilimanjaro. Guide to GIS and Image Processing. Worcester, MA: Clark University Press. 2003; p. 305.