An Analysis of the Impact of Socio-Economic Variables upon Local Communities’ Participation in Rangeland Protection (Case study: Gomorgan Village-Malard County)

Authors
1 M.Sc. Student Desert Management Department of Arid and Mountains Regions Reclamation, Faculty of Natural Resources,University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran
2 Professor, Departmentof Arid and Mountains Regions Reclamation, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran
3 Associate professor, Department of Arid and Mountains Regions Reclamation, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran
4 Assistant Professor, Departments of Agricultural Economics,Faculty of Economics and Agricultural Development, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran
Abstract
Background: The participation of local communities is considered as one of the major factors contributing to social and economic growth and development in rangeland management. Therefore, an analysis of variables affecting their participation contributes greatly to foreseeing the needs and fulfilling the shortages of a participation program. The present paper is an attempt to investigate the impact of socio- economic variables effecting local communities’ participation.
Materials and Methods:The pilot area of the present study was Gomorgan village in Malard County (Tehran Province). Regression function was used for examining the impact of explanatory variables (socio-economic) upon participation of local communities to rangeland protection. Shazam 9 software was applied for logit regression function analysis.
Results: It was found out that the variables such as age, education, bid and importance of rangelands as livestock production inputs had negative effects upon local communities’ participation in Malard’s rangeland protection, whileincome had positive effects.
Conclusions: It can be concluded that enhancing the socio- economic condition of local community could be a useful tool to increase the success level of the conservation projects in rangeland management.
Keywords

  1. Williams WD. Community participation in conserving and managing inland waters. Aqu Con J. 2002; 12(3): 315-326.

  2. Li W, Liu J, Li D. Getting their voices heard: Three cases of public participation in environmental protection in China. J Environ Manag. 2012; 5: 65-72.

  3. Olawoye JE. Sociological issues in sustainable forest management. Ghana J Forum. 1996, 3: 13-18.

  4. Baddgi GL. People participation in soil and water conservation through watershed approach,Indian: International Book Distributing (IBDs). 2005; p. 177.

  5. Reed MS, Graves A, Posthumus H, Hubacek K, Morris J, Norman D, et al. Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. J Environ Manage. 2009; 90: 1933-1949.

  6. Heydari Gh, RastegarSh, Forotani B. Investigating socio-economic factors affecting the participation of local communities in the sustainable management of rangelands (case study: Bahar rangelands in Hamadan Province). Rangeland J. 2014; 1(4): 126-148. (In Persian)

  7. Judge GG, Hill RC, Griffithes WE, Lukepohl H, Lee TC. The theory and practice of econometrics. Second edition, Wiley, New York, USA. 1988; p. 560.

  8. Lin PC, Chang CH. Towards sustainable community-based natural resource management in the indigenous Meqmegi community in Taiwan: rethinking impacts of local participation. Natura Res Forum J. 2011; 35: 134-144.

  9. Lee CK, Lee JH, MeldeJW, Scott D, Kim TK. Assessing the economic value ofa public bird watching interpretative service using a contingent valuation method. Inter J Tourism Res. 2009; 11: 583-593.

  10. Laeane G, Mahmoude S, Rafiee H. Effecting of moral preferences on willingness to pay for use of environmental (case study: Shahidzare forest, Sari county). Iran. J Environ Res. 2015; 5(10): 183-194. (In Persian).

  11. Mahmoudi J, HeidariGh, Mirbozorgi MS. The obstructions of grazing management project from the viewpoint of Natural Resources Experts. Renew Natur Res J. 2011; 2(4): 231-242. (In Persian).