Modeling Urban Growth Effects on Landscape Structure in Gorgan City Area

Authors
1 Former MSc.Student, Faculty of Natural Resources, Tarbiat Modares University, Noor, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Faculty of Fisheries and Environment, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran
Abstract
Logistic regression (LR) was used to model urban growth between the years 1987 and 2001 in Gorgan city, north east of Iran. Three groups of variables including economic-social, land use and biophysical variables were used in the modeling practice. Using covariance of the independent variables, distance to administrative and sporting centers plus distance to cities were removed. ROC (Relative Operating Characteristic) value for LR was 0.87 that confirmed success of the modeling method. Using maps of urban growth probability predicted by the LR model, urban distribution patterns for the years 2010, 2020, 2030, 2040 and 2050 were created. Land use maps for the years 2001-2050 were created using urban probability pattern maps and the base land use map of the year 1987. We used landscape metrics at class and landscape levels to compare the urban growth effects on other land use types present in the area. The comparison showed that urban development influences agriculture and pasture land use types more than other land uses. Also, we found that the landscape in the study area has undergone fragmentation and will become more fragmented and heterogeneous over time. Urban growth creates higher urban patchiness and increases the number of pasture and agricultural patches. The information thus obtained is helpful in more effective management of the area.
Keywords

Allen, J., Lu, K., Modeling and prediction of future urban growth in the Charleston Region of South Carolina: a GIS-based Integrated Approach. Conserva. Ecol., 2003; 8(2): 2.
André B.L. and Jack A. Applying landscape ecological concepts and metrics in sustainable landscape planning. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2002; 59: 65-93.
Braimoh, A.K. and Onishi, T. Geostatistical techniques for incorporating spatial correlation into land use change models. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf., 2007b; 9: 438-446.
Brown, D.G., Pijanowski, B.C. and Duh, J.D. Modeling the relationships between land-use and land-cover on private lands in the Upper Midwest, USA. J. Environment. Manage., 2001; 59: 247-263.
Cabrera, A.F. Logistic regression analysis in Higher Education: An applied perspective. In John C. Smart (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and research. New York, Agathon Press. 1994; 10: 225-256.
Clarke, K.C., Hoppen, S. and Gaydos, L. A self-modifying cellular automaton model of historical urbanization in the San Francisco Bay area. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. 1997; 24: 247- 261.
Eastman, J.R. IDRISI Kilimanjaro, Guide to GIS and Image Processing. Clark Labs, Clark University. Worcester, USA. 2003; 360P.
Eastman, J.R. Idrisi Taiga, Guide to GIS and Image Processing, Clark Labs, Clark University. Worcester, USA. 2009; 325P.
Forman, R.T.T. and Godron, M. Landscape Ecology. JohnWiley & Sons, New York, USA. 1986; 620P.
Geoghegan, J., Villar, S.C., Klepeis, P., Mendoza, P.M., Himmelberger, Y.O. and Chowdhury, R.R. Modeling tropical deforestation in the southern Yucatan peninsula region: comparing survey & satellite data. Agricult. Ecosyst. Environ., 2001; 85: 25-46.
Green, D.M. and Swets, J.A. Signal detection theory and psychophysics. Peninsula Publishing, Los Altos, California, USA. 1966; 521P.
Griffith, J.A., Martunko, E.A. and Price, K.P. Landscape structure analysis of Kansas at three scales. Landsc. Urban Plann. 2000; 52: 45-61.
Hosmer, D.W. and Lemeshow, S.Applied logistic regression. A Wiley-Interscience publication. New York. 1989; 392P.
Hu, Z. and Lo, C.P. Modeling urban growth in Atlanta using logistic regression. Comput. Environ. Urban, 2007; 31: 667-688.
Leitao, A.B. and Ahern, J. Applying landscape ecological concepts and metrics in sustainable landscape planning. Landscape Urban Plann. 2002; 59: 65-93.
Li, F. The theoretical analysis on the landscape ecological method application in desertification monitor. Arid Zone Research, 1997; 14: 69-73 (in Chinese).
Li, X., Lu, L., Cheng, G.D. and Xiao, H.L. Quantifying landscape structure of the Heihe River Basin, north-west China using FRAGSTATS. J. Arid Environ., 2001;48: 521-535.
Lin, Y.P., Wu, P.J. and Hong, M.M. The effects of changing the resolution of land-use modeling on simulations of land-use patterns and hydrology for a watershed land-use planning assessment in Wu-Tu, Taiwan. Landscape Urban Plan., 2008;87: 54-66.
Liu, Y., Nishiyama, S. and Kusaka, T. Examining landscape dynamics at a watershed scale using Landsat TM imagery fro detection of wintering hooded crane decline in Yashiro, Japan. Environ. Manage., 2003; 31(3): 365-376.
Mason, S.J. and Graham, N.E. Conditional probabilities, relative operating characteristics, and relative operating levels. Weather Forecast., 1999; 14: 713-725.
Matsushita, B., Xu, M. and Fukushima, T. Characterizing the changes in landscape structure in the Lake Kasumigaura Basin, Japan using a high-quality GIS dataset. Landscape Urban Plann. 2006; 78: 241-250.
McGarigal, K. and Marks, B.J. FRAGSTATS: Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Quantifying Landscape Structure. Forest Science Department, Oregon State University, Corvallis. 1995; 134P.
Medley, K., Okey, B.W., Barrett, G.W., Lucas, M.F. and Renwick, W.H. Landscape change with agricultural intensification in a rural watershed, southwestern Ohio, USA. Landscape Ecol., 1995; 10(3): 161-176.
Pauleit S. and Duhme F. Assessing the environmental performance of land cover types for urban planning. Landscape Urban Plan., 2000; 52: 1-20.
Peterson, W.W. and Birdsall, T.G. The theory of signal detectability: Part I. The general theory. Electronic Defense Group, Technical Report 13, June 1953. University of Michigan. 1953; 90P.
Riitters, K.H., O’neill, R.V., Hunsaker, C.T.,Wickham, J.D.,Yankee, D.H., Timmins, S.P., Jones, K.B. and Jackson, B.L. A factor analysis of landscape pattern and structure metrics. Landscape Ecol., 1995; 10 (1), 23-39.
Serneels, S. and Lambin, E.F.Proximate causes of land-use change in Narok District, Kenya: a spatial statistical model. Agricul. Ecosyst. Environ., 2001; 85: 65-81.
Theobald, D.M. and Hobbs, N.T. Forecasting rural land-use change: a comparison of regression and spatial transition-based models. Geographical Environ. Modeling, 1998; 2(1): 65-82.
Turner, M.G., Gardner, R.H. and O’Neill, R.V. Landscape Ecology in Theory and Practice: Pattern and Process. Springer-Verlag, New York, USA. 2001; 401P.
Turner, M.G. Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 1989; 20: 171-197.
Turner, M.G., O’Neill, R.V., Gardner, R.H. and Milne, B.T. Effects of changing spatial scale on the analysis of landscape pattern. Landsc. Ecol., 1989; 3: 153-162.
Vesterby, M. and Heimlich, R. Land use and demographic change: results from fast growing counties. Land Econ., 1991; 67(3): 279-291.
Vitousek, P.M. Beyond global warming: ecology and global change. Ecol., 1994; 75: 1861-1876.
Wu JG., Landscape Ecology: Pattern, Progress, Scale and Hierarchy. Beijing: Higher Education Press., 2000; 96–117.
Wu, F. and Yeh, A.G. Changing spatial distribution and determinants of land development in Chinese cities in the transition from a centrally planned economy to a socialist market economy: a case study of Guangzhou. Urban Studies. 1997; 34(11): 1851-1880.
Xiao, D.-N., Zhao, Y., Sun, Z. and Zhang, H. Study on the variation of landscape pattern in the west suburbs of Shenyang. Chinese J. Appl. Ecol., 1990; 1: 75-84 (in Chinese).