Downstream Enrichment in the Transport and Storage of Sediment Fingerprint Properties

Authors
A. Kouhpeima 1
S. Feiznia 2
1 Islamic Azad University, Shiraz
2 University of Tehran, Karaj
Abstract
Today fingerprinting techniques are increasingly adopted as an alternative and more direct and reliable means of assembling sediment source information. One of the principal assumptions of sediment fingerprinting is that potential catchment sediment sources can be distinguished on the basis of their physical, geochemical and biological properties or fingerprint properties. However, while the source fingerprinting approaches necessarily assume conservative behaviour of the fingerprint properties, some in-stream alteration of these properties during both transport and short-term storage is probably inevitable. This potential limitation must be judged in the context of the problems associated with the use of sediment fingerprinting techniques. Samples of sediment source and reservoir sediment collected during the present study have been used to determine the conservative behavior of fifteen fingerprint properties. Comparison of fingerprinting property concentrations of intensive properties used in fingerprinting indicates there is an increase in content of the N, P, C, Co, Cr, clay minerals (smectite, illite, kaolinite), Low Frequency Magnetic Susceptibility (XLF) and Frequency Dependent Magnetic Susceptibility (XFD) and decrease in clay mineral chlorite and base cations Ca, Mg, Na and K. The results indicate that N, Na and smectite properties have no significant difference in reservoir sediment samples than that in sediment source samples and therefore are useful for fingerprinting investigations in these catchments.
Keywords
Conservative behavior
Fingerprinting properties
Reservoir sediment
Sediment sources
Allen, S.E. Chemical Analysis of Ecological Materials. Blackwell, Oxford, 1989; 368 P.
Caitcheon, G.G. Sediment source tracing using environmental magnetism: A new approach with examples from Australia. Hydrological Processes, 1993; 7: 349-358.
Caitcheon, G.G. The significance of various sediment magnetic mineral fractions for tracing sediment sources in Killimicat Creek. Catena, 1998; 32: 131-142.
Collins, A.L., Walling, D.E. and Leeks, G.J.L. Use of composite fingerprints to determine the provenance of the contemporary suspended sediment loads transported by rivers. Earth Surf Processes Landf, 1998; 23: 31-52.
Collins, A.L. and Walling, D.E. Selecting fingerprinting properties for discriminating potential suspended sediment sources in river basins. J. Hydrol., 2002; 261: 218-244.
Collins, A.L., Walling, D.E., Webb, L. and King, P. Apportioning watershed scale sediment sources using a modified composite fingerprinting technique incorporating property weightings and prior information, Geoderma, 2010; 155: 249-261.
Foster, I.D.L. and Walling, D.E. Using reservoir deposits to reconstruct hanging sediment yields and sources in the watershed of the Old Mill Reservoir, South Evon, UK, over the past 50 years. Hydrol. Sci. J., 1994; 39: 347-368.
Garrad, P.N. and Hey, R.D. Sources of suspended and deposited sediment in a broadland river. Earth Surf Processes Landf, 1989; 14: 41-62.
Grimshaw, D.L. and Lewin, J. Source identification for suspended sediment, J. Hydrol., 1980; 47: 151-162.
Horowitz, A.J. A Primer on Sediment Trace Element Chemistry. Lewis Publishers, Helsea, MI, 1991; 134 P.
Horowitz, A.J. and Ehick, K. The relation of stream sediment surface area, grain size and composition to trace element chemistry. Appl Geochem, 1987; 2: 437-451.
Kouhpeima, A., Hashemi, S.A.A., Feiznia, S. and Ahmadi, H. Using sediment deposited in small reservoirs to quantify sediment yield in two small watersheds of Iran. Can. J. Sustainable Dev., 2010; 3: 133-139.
Kouhpeima, A., Feiznia, S. and Ahmadi, H. Tracing fine sediment sources in small mountain watershed. Water Sci. Technol., 2011; 63, 2324-2330.
Martínez-Carreras N., Udelhoven, T., Krein, A., Gallart, F., Iffly, J. F., Ziebel, J., Hoffmann, L., Pfister, L., and Walling, D. E. The use of sediment colour measured by diffuse reflectance spectrometry to determine sediment sources: Application to the Attert River watershed (Luxembourg), J. Hydrol., 2010; 382: 49-63.
Nie, N.H. Hull, C.H. Jenkins, J.G. Steinbrenner, K. and Bent, D. H. Statistical package for the Social Science. 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1975; 320 p.
Olsen, S.R. and Dean, L.A. Phosphorus. In: CA. Black (Editor), Methods of Soil Chemical Analysis Part 2. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, 1965; 1035-1049.
Qui, X.-C. and Zhu, Y.-Q. Rapid analysis of cation exchange properties in acidic soils. J. Soil Sci., 1993; 15.5: 301-308.
Stone, M. and Saunderson, H. Particle size characteristics of suspended sediment in southern Ontario rivers tributary to the Great Lakes, Geological Society Special Publication, 1992; 57: 31-45.
Wallbrink, P.J. and Murray, A.S. Distribution and variability of 7Be in soils under different surface cover conditions and its potential for describing soil redistribution processes. Water Resour. Res., 1996; 32: 467-476.
Walling, D.E. Tracing suspended sediment sources in watersheds and river systems. Sci. Total Environ, 2005; 344: 159-184.
Walling, D.E., Collins, A.L. and Stroud, R.W. Tracing suspended sediment and particular phosphorus in watersheds. J. Hydrol., 2008; 350: 274-289.