Impact of Phanerogam and Soil Characteristics on Bryophyte Assemblages with Respect to Restoration Practices (Case Study: IJzermonding, Belgium)

Author
R. Erfanzadeh
Tarbiat Modares University, Noor
Abstract
The effect of soil and phanerogam characteristics on bryophytes composition, richness, abundance and functional groups were investigated in order to understand the factors responsible for bryophytes distribution patterns. Three different sand dunes were selected: untouched, artificial sod-covered and planted by Ammophila. Along 10 transects perpendicular to the shore, a total of 142 permanent relevés, located in three sand dunes, were sampled. In each plot, total cover of vascular herbaceous and bryophytes, and the percentage of litter were estimated. The average of vascular herbaceous height was measured. In each plot, EC, pH, CaCo3, texture and organic matter content of the upper 5 cm layer were also measured. Analyses using DCA and GLM showed that bryophytes abundance was decreased by EC and phanerogam abundance, while pH increased the species richness of bryophytes. EC increased the relative abundance of sexual species while decreased the relative abundance of asexual bryophytes species. The relative abundance of colonists increased in planted Ammophila sand dune while the relative abundance of perennial stayers was the highest in untouched sand dune. The successional stage should also be important in distribution pattern of bryophytes.
Keywords
Bryophyte
Phanerogam cover
Sand dune
Soil characteristics
Restoration management
Succession
Bergamini, A., Pauli, D., Peintinger, M. and Schmid, B. Relationships between productivity, number of shoots and number of species in bryophytes and vascular plants. J. Ecol., 2001; 89: 920-929.
Birks, H.J.B. Quantifying bryophyte-environment relationships. In: Bates, J.W., Ashton, N.W. and Duckett, J.G. (eds), Bryology for the twenty- first century. Wiley, 1998; 305-319.
Crittenden, P.D. The role of lichens in the nitrogen economy of subarctic woodlands: nitrogen loss from the nitrogen-fixing lichen Stereocaulon paschale during rainfall. In: Eee, J.A., McNeill, S. and Rorison, 1. H. (eds). Nitrogen as an ecological factor, Blackwell, 1983; 43-68.
Düll, R. Indicator values of mosses and liverworts. Scrip. Geobotany, 1992; 18: 175-214.
During, H.J. Life strategies of bryophytes: a preliminary review. Lindbergia, 1979; 5: 2-18.
During, H.J. and Lioret, F. Permanent grid studies in bryophytes communities, pattern and dynamic of individual species. J. Hattori Bot. Lab., 1996; 79: 1-41.
During, H.J. and Versehuren, G.A. Influence of the tree canopy on terrestrial bryophyte communities: microclimate and chemistry of throughfall. - In: Barkman, J.J. and Sykora, K.V. (eds). Dependent plant communities. SPB Academic Publ., 1988; 99-110.
Ejrnæs, R. and Poulsen, R.S. Cryptogam – environment relationships in Danish grasslands. Lindbergia, 2001; 26: 121-128.
Erfanzadeh, R., Petillon. J., Maelfait, J.P. and Hoffmann, M. Environmental determinism versus biotic stochaticity in the appearance of plant species in salt-marsh succession. Plant Ecol. Evol., 2010; 143: 43-50.
Garbary, D.J., Miller, A.G., Scrosati, R., Kim, K.Y. and Schofield, W.B. Distribution and salinity tolerance of intertidal mosses from Nova Scotian salt marshes. The Bryologist, 2008; 111: 282-291.
Herben, T. Bryophtes in grassland vegetation sample plots: what is their correlation with vascular plants? Folia Geobot. Phytotx., 1987; 22: 35-41.
Hylander, K., Dynesius, M. Causes of the large variation in bryophyte species richness and composition among boreal streamside forest. J. Veg. Sci., 2006; 17: 333-346.
Ingerpuu, N., Kull, K. and Vellak, K. Bryophyte vegetation in a woodland meadow: relationships with phanerogam diversity and responses to fertilization. Plant Ecol., 1998; 134: 163-171.
Ingerpuu, N., Liira, J. and Partel, M. Vascular plants facilitated bryophytes in a grassland experiment. Plant Ecol., 2005; 180: 69-75.
Joenje, W. and During, H.J. Colonisation of a desalinating Wadden-polder by bryophytes. Plant. Ecol., 1977; 35: 177-185.
Kimmerer, R.W. Disturbance and dominance in Tetraphis pellucida: a model of disturbance frequency and reproductive mode. Bryologist, 1993; 96: 73-79.
Kull O., Aan A. and Soelsepp T. Light interception, nitrogen and leaf mass distribution in a multilayer plant community. Funct. Ecol., 1995; 9: 589-595.
Kürschner, H. Life strategies and adaptations in bryophytes from the near and Middle East. Turk. J. Bot., 2004; 28: 73-84.
Lepš, J. and Šmilauer, P. Multivariate analysis of ecological data using CANOCO. Published by the press syndicate of the University of Cambridge. UK. 2005.
Londo, G. The decimal scale for relevés of permanent quadrats. Plant. Ecol., 1976; 33: 61-64.
Martinez-Sanchez, J.J. A special habitat for bryophytes and lichens in the arid zones of Spain. Lindbergia, 1994; 19: 116-121.
Martinez, M.L. and Maun, M.A. Responses of dune mosses to experimental burial by sand under natural and greenhouse conditions. Plant Ecol., 1999; 145: 209-219.
Mills, S.E., Macdonald, S.E. Predictors of moss and liverwort species diversity of microsites in conifer-dominated boreal forest. J. Veg. Sci., 2004; 15: 189-198.
Mueller-Dombois, D. and Ellenberg, H. Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. The Blackburn Press, New Jersey, USA. 2002.
Packham, J.R. and Willis, A.J. Ecology of dunes, salt marsh and shingle. Chapman and Hall, London, UK. 1997.
Rieley, J.O., Richards, P.W. and Bebbington, D.L. The ecological role of bryophytes in a North Wales woodland. J. Ecol., 1979; 67: 497-527.
Rundel, P.W. The ecological role of secondary lichen substances. Biochem. Syst. Ecol., 1978; 6: 157-170.
Siebel, H.N. and During, H.J. Beknopte mosflora van Nederland en Belgie¨. KNNV Uitgeverij, Utrecht, NL. 2006.
Smith, A.J.E. The moss flora of Britain and Ireland. Published by the Press Syndicate of the University of Cambrige. UK. 1980.
Söderström, L. and Gunnarsson, U. Life History Strategies. A Catalogue of population Biology Parameters for Bryophytes occurring in North-Western Europe. Manual v. 1.0 - Bryoplanet, Trondheim, Norway, 2003.
Stoutjesdijk, P. and Barkman, J.J. Microclimate, vegetation and fauna. Opulus Press, Uppsala,van Tooren, B. F. 1990. Effects of a bryophyte layer on the emergence of seedlings of chalk grassland species. Acta Oecol., 1992; 11: 155-163.
Van der poorten, A. and Engels, P. The effect of environmental variation on bryophytes at a regional scale. Ecography, 2002; 25: 513-522.
Van Tooren, B.F., van Dam, D. and During, H.J. The relative importance of percipitation and soil as source of nutrients for Calliergonella cuspidata in chalk grassland. Funct. Ecol., 1990; 4: 101-107.
Virtanen, R., Johnston, A.E., Crawley, M.J. and Edwards, G.R. Bryophytes biomass and species richness on the Park Grass Experiment, Rothamsted, UK. Plant Ecol., 2000; 151: 129-141.
Vitt, D.H., Li, Y. and Belland, R. Patterns of bryophyte diversity in peatlands of continental western Canada. Bryologist, 1995; 98: 218-227.
Watson, M.A. Patterns of habitat occupation in mosses–relevance to considerations of the niche. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club, 1980; 107: 346-372.
Zamfir, M., Dai, X. and van der Maarel, E. Bryophytes, lichens and phanerogams in an alvar grassland:relationships at different scales and contributions to plant community pattern. Ecography, 1999; 22: 40-52.