Volume 13, Issue 2 (2025)
ECOPERSIA 2025, 13(2): 165-181 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Fathi E, Talebi A, Ekhtesasi M, Mosaffaie J, Akbari Z. Sustainability Assessment of the Malekshahi Watershed Based on Ecological and Socio-Economic Criteria in Iran. ECOPERSIA 2025; 13 (2) :165-181
URL: http://ecopersia.modares.ac.ir/article-24-62092-en.html
URL: http://ecopersia.modares.ac.ir/article-24-62092-en.html
1- PhD Student in Watershed Science and Engineering, Department of Rangeland and Watershed Management, Faculty of Natural Resources and Desertology, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran.
2- Yazd University ,talebisf@yazd.ac.ir
3- Professor, Rangeland and Watershed Department, Faculty of Natural Resources and Desertology, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran.
4- Associate Professor, Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research Institute, AgriculturalResearch,Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran, Iran
2- Yazd University ,
3- Professor, Rangeland and Watershed Department, Faculty of Natural Resources and Desertology, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran.
4- Associate Professor, Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research Institute, AgriculturalResearch,Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (254 Views)
Aims: Achieving sustainable development requires a balanced interaction between ecological, economic, and social dimensions. This study aims to assess the sustainability of the Malekshahi watershed based on the indicators defined in the Monitoring and Evaluation Guidelines for Natural Resource Management Plans in Iran.
Materials & Methods: In this regard, four ecosystems—forest, rangeland, aquatic, and human—were examined. The forest ecosystem was evaluated based on six criteria, including forest resource extent, biodiversity, health, vitality and integrity, productive functions of forest resources, protective and environmental functions, and socio-economic functions. The rangeland ecosystem was assessed using soil sustainability, vegetation cover, and socio-economic sustainability criteria. The aquatic ecosystem was analyzed using eight water quality indicators, including electrical conductivity (EC), total dissolved solids (TDS), dissolved oxygen (DO), dissolved phosphorus index, phytoplankton index, biological oxygen demand (BOD), FBI index, and fish index. The human ecosystem was analyzed based on nine criteria, including population dynamics, poverty and livelihood conditions, education and skills, nutrition and food security, health and sanitation, housing and public services, land-use change, technology and productivity, and institutional organization and development. Findings: The results showed that the forest ecosystem (score: 55), human ecosystem (19.2), and aquatic ecosystem were in a good condition, while the rangeland ecosystem (48) was in a moderate condition. The final watershed sustainability score was 8.36, indicating a moderate level of sustainability in the region.
Conclusion: Emphasizing the balance among these ecosystems through an ecosystem-based approach can contribute to improving sustainability. These findings are applicable in watershed management and land-use planning.
Materials & Methods: In this regard, four ecosystems—forest, rangeland, aquatic, and human—were examined. The forest ecosystem was evaluated based on six criteria, including forest resource extent, biodiversity, health, vitality and integrity, productive functions of forest resources, protective and environmental functions, and socio-economic functions. The rangeland ecosystem was assessed using soil sustainability, vegetation cover, and socio-economic sustainability criteria. The aquatic ecosystem was analyzed using eight water quality indicators, including electrical conductivity (EC), total dissolved solids (TDS), dissolved oxygen (DO), dissolved phosphorus index, phytoplankton index, biological oxygen demand (BOD), FBI index, and fish index. The human ecosystem was analyzed based on nine criteria, including population dynamics, poverty and livelihood conditions, education and skills, nutrition and food security, health and sanitation, housing and public services, land-use change, technology and productivity, and institutional organization and development. Findings: The results showed that the forest ecosystem (score: 55), human ecosystem (19.2), and aquatic ecosystem were in a good condition, while the rangeland ecosystem (48) was in a moderate condition. The final watershed sustainability score was 8.36, indicating a moderate level of sustainability in the region.
Conclusion: Emphasizing the balance among these ecosystems through an ecosystem-based approach can contribute to improving sustainability. These findings are applicable in watershed management and land-use planning.
Article Type: Original Research |
Subject:
Watershed Management
Received: 2022/06/8 | Revised: 2025/06/11 | Accepted: 2025/04/30 | Published: 2025/03/20
Received: 2022/06/8 | Revised: 2025/06/11 | Accepted: 2025/04/30 | Published: 2025/03/20
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |