Volume 9, Issue 4 (2021)                   ECOPERSIA 2021, 9(4): 251-263 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Islami I, Farajollahi A, Ghasemi Aryan Y. Improving rural livelihood based on natural resources potentials in Najafabad region, Kurdistan Province, Iran. ECOPERSIA 2021; 9 (4) :251-263
URL: http://ecopersia.modares.ac.ir/article-24-48646-en.html
1- Assistant Professor, Department of Rangeland Management, Faculty of Natural Resources, Tarbiat Modares University (TMU), Noor P.O.Box (46417-76489), Mazandaran Province, Iran. , i.eslami@modares.ac.ir
2- Ph.D. Graduate, Combating Desertification, Gorgan University of Agricultural Science and Natural Resources, Golestan, Iran.
3- Assistant professor, Desert Research Division, Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, Teharan, Iran.
Abstract:   (1427 Views)
Aim The present study aimed to analyze the strategies based on natural resource potentials to improve the livelihood of rural households in Najafabad region of Kurdistan province using SWOT analysis.
Methods The statistical population of this study included experts and rural residents. The sample size was 337 rural residents and 51 experts based on Cochran formula and matching with Krejcie and Morgan table. The items of questionnaires designed as a rating scale based on the five options Likert. Reliability of questionnaires was determined by Cronbach's alpha that obtained 0.85 for rural residents and 0.82 for experts. SWOT model was used to determine strategies for improving the livelihood of rural households.
Findings According to the results, “natural potentials such as suitable rangelands for animal husbandry” and “the presence of local, committed and experienced manpower in the village” were determined as the most important strengths from the viewpoint of experts and rural residents, respectively. “Traditional use and exploitation of rangeland and agricultural lands” and “high unemployment rate and low income” were determined as the most important weaknesses from the viewpoint of experts and rural residents, with a relative weight of 86.27 and 86.62, respectively. “The existence of a favorable vision and serious effort for rural development in the country” and “providing credit facilities and low-interest loans” were the most important opportunities.
Conclusion A competitive strategy has been obtained for improving the livelihood of the studied region relying on teaching and planning new methods of exploiting water resources and planting drought-resistant species.
Full-Text [PDF 1933 kb]   (561 Downloads)    
Article Type: Original Research | Subject: Nature and Landscape Conservation
Received: 2020/12/25 | Accepted: 2021/04/10 | Published: 2021/09/19

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.