Volume 6, Issue 4 (2018)
ECOPERSIA 2018, 6(4): 225-233 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Arabkhedri M, Mahmoodabadi M, Taghizadeh S, Zoratipour A. Causes of Severe Erosion in a Clayey Soil under Rainfall and Inflow Simulation. ECOPERSIA 2018; 6 (4) :225-233
URL: http://ecopersia.modares.ac.ir/article-24-19178-en.html
URL: http://ecopersia.modares.ac.ir/article-24-19178-en.html
1- Soil Conservation & Watershed Management Research Institute, Agriculture Research, Education & Extension Organization, Tehran, Iran , arabkhedri@scwmri.ac.ir
2- Soil Science Department, Agriculture Faculty, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran
3- Nature Engineering Department, Agriculture Faculty, Khuzestan Agricultural Sciences & Natural Resources University, Khuzestan, Iran
2- Soil Science Department, Agriculture Faculty, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran
3- Nature Engineering Department, Agriculture Faculty, Khuzestan Agricultural Sciences & Natural Resources University, Khuzestan, Iran
Abstract: (5666 Views)
Aims: Soil erosion has been known as the most important land degradation feature in the globe and is also identified as a serious environmental threat due to its onsite and offsite effects. The aims of this study were to evaluate temporal changes of sediment concentration in a soil with high clay content under erosion by rainfall and inflow as well as interpreting the reasons for their very high erosion rate.
Materials & Methods: This experimental study was done in the Rainfall and Erosion Simulation Laboratory of the Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research Institute (SCWMRI). All experiments were performed at a 20% slope gradient under 55.9mm.h-1 rain intensity for 30 minutes. Four slope lengths (1, 6, 12 and 18m) were considered for erosion simulation. With regard to the 6m length of the flume, 1 and 6m lengths were simulated only under rainfall and the other two longer lengths by combining rainfall-inflow.
Findings: Very high concentrations up to 80, 59, 40 and 9gr.l-1 were recorded in 18, 12, 6 and 1m slope lengths, respectively. Sediment concentration increased exponentially by increasing the length of the slope that could be explained by the influence of flow velocity increase on longer slopes. The high sediment concentration could be justified by the breakdown of the soil mass during rainfall and the formation of more than 65.0% of fine aggregates in the size of silt and very fine sand.
Conclusion: The erodibility of clayey soil can be explained by the secondary aggregate size distribution rather than texture properties.
Materials & Methods: This experimental study was done in the Rainfall and Erosion Simulation Laboratory of the Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research Institute (SCWMRI). All experiments were performed at a 20% slope gradient under 55.9mm.h-1 rain intensity for 30 minutes. Four slope lengths (1, 6, 12 and 18m) were considered for erosion simulation. With regard to the 6m length of the flume, 1 and 6m lengths were simulated only under rainfall and the other two longer lengths by combining rainfall-inflow.
Findings: Very high concentrations up to 80, 59, 40 and 9gr.l-1 were recorded in 18, 12, 6 and 1m slope lengths, respectively. Sediment concentration increased exponentially by increasing the length of the slope that could be explained by the influence of flow velocity increase on longer slopes. The high sediment concentration could be justified by the breakdown of the soil mass during rainfall and the formation of more than 65.0% of fine aggregates in the size of silt and very fine sand.
Conclusion: The erodibility of clayey soil can be explained by the secondary aggregate size distribution rather than texture properties.
Article Type: Original Research |
Subject:
Land Degradation and Soil Erosion
Received: 2018/04/19 | Accepted: 2018/07/16 | Published: 2018/11/21
Received: 2018/04/19 | Accepted: 2018/07/16 | Published: 2018/11/21
References
1. Pimentel D, Burgess M. Soil erosion threatens food production. Agriculture. 2013;3(3):443-63. [Link] [DOI:10.3390/agriculture3030443]
2. FAO, ITPS. Status of the World's Soil Resources (SWSR), main report [Internet]. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and Intergovernmental Technical Panel on Soils; 2015 [cited 2016 March 17]. Available from: http://www.fao.org/3/a-i5199e.pdf [Link]
3. Pan C, Shangguan Z, Lei T. Influences of grass and moss on runoff and sediment yield on sloped loess surfaces under simulated rainfall. Hydrol Process. 2006;20(18):3815-24. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/hyp.6158]
4. World Bank. Iran, Islamic Republic of - cost assessment of environmental degradation [Internet]. Washington D C: World Bank; 2005 [cited 2016 March 16]. Available from: http://bit.ly/2C5ANkc [Link]
5. Refahi HG. Water erosion and conservation. 7th Edition. Tehran: University of Tehran Press; 2017. [Persian] [Link]
6. ArabKhedri M. A review on major water erosion factors in Iran. J Land Manag. 2014;2(2):115-24. [Persian] [Link]
7. Sharma PP. Interrill erosion. In: Agassi M. Soil erosion conservation, and rehabilitation. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1995. pp. 125-52. [Link]
8. Raziei T, Daryabari J, Bordi I, Pereira LS. Spatial patterns and temporal trends of precipitation in Iran. Theor Appl Climatol. 2014;115(3-4):531-40. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s00704-013-0919-8]
9. Sharifi F, Mousivand A, Saadat H, Hoseini Razi MM. Maleki Beigdeli A, Bahrami HA, et al. Soil erosion atlas and landscape of the country's watersheds, synthesizing, integration and accretion of datas. Tehran: Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research Institute; 2015. [Persian] [Link]
10. Shaban M, Feiznia S, Ahmadi H, Peyrowan HR. Categorization of Marl units with new method and investigation of sediment and runoff under field rainfall simulator: A case study of Taleghan watershed, Iran. Aust J Basic Appl Sci. 2013;7(1):312-9. [Link]
11. Zoratipour A. Dynamic modeling of soil erosion in Marl Formations, based on rainfall properties and physical factors [Dissertation]. Tehran: University of Tehran; 2012. [Persian] [Link]
12. Morgan RPC. Soil erosion and conservation. 3rd Edition. Hoboken: Wiley; 2005. [Link]
13. Defersha MB, Melesse AM. Effect of rainfall intensity, slope and antecedent moisture content on sediment concentration and sediment enrichment ratio. Catena. 2012;90:47-52. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.catena.2011.11.002]
14. Mahmoodabadi M, Arjmand Sajjadi S. Effects of rain intensity, slope gradient and particle size distribution on the relative contributions of splash and wash loads to rain-induced erosion. Geomorphology. 2016;253:159-67. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.10.010]
15. Di Stefano C, Ferro V, Pampalone V, Sanzone F. Field investigation of rill and ephemeral gully erosion in the Sparacia experimental area, South Italy. Catena. 2013;101:226-34. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.catena.2012.10.012]
16. Lal R. Effects of slope length, slope gradient, tillage methods and cropping systems on runoff and soil erosion on a tropical Alfisol: Preliminary results. IAHS Publ. 1988;174:79-88. [Link]
17. Fu X, Zhang L. Impact of slope length on soil erosion of sloping farmland with crop in red soil hilly region. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng. 2014;30(5):91-8. [Link]
18. Poesen J. Soil erosion in the anthropocene: Research needs. Earth Surf Process Landf. 2018;43(1):64-84. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/esp.4250]
19. Bryan RB, Poesen J. Laboratory experiments on the influence of slope length on runoff, percolation and rill development. Earth Surf Process Landf. 1989;14(3):211-31. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/esp.3290140304]
20. Sadeghi SHR, Bashari Seghaleh M, Rangavar AS. Plot sizes dependency of runoff and sediment yield estimates from a small watershed. Catena. 2013;102:55-61. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.catena.2011.01.003]
21. Kinnell PIA. The impact of slope length on the discharge of sediment by rain impact induced saltation and suspension. Earth Surf Process Landf. 2009;34(10):1393-407. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/esp.1828]
22. Mahmoodabadi M, Ghadiri H, Rose C, Yu B, Rafahi HG, Rouhipour H. Evaluation of GUEST and WEPP with a new approach for the determination of sediment transport capacity. J Hydrol. 2014;513:413-21. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.03.060]
23. Ming C, Qiangguo C, Axing Z, Haoming F. Soil erosion along a long slope in the gentle hilly areas of black soil region in Northeast China. J Geogr Sci. 2007;17(3):375-83. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s11442-007-0375-4]
24. Fu X, Zhang L, College of Water Resources Science and Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Subtropical Soil and Plant Nutrition, Key Laboratory of Polluted Environment Remediation and Ecological Health, et al. Impact of slope length on red soil erosion under simulated rainfall. J Basic Sci Eng. 2015;(3):474-83. [Link]
25. Bagio B, Bertol I, Wolschick NH, Schneiders D, Dos Santos MAN. Water erosion in different slope lengths on bare soil. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo. 2017;41(Div 3):e0160132. [Link]
26. Liu QJ, An J, Zhang GH, Wu XY. The effect of row grade and length on soil erosion from concentrated flow in furrows of contouring ridge systems. Soil Tillage Res. 2016;160:92-100. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.still.2016.02.012]
27. Arjmand Sajjadi S, Mahmoodabadi M. Sediment concentration and hydraulic characteristics of rain-induced overland flows in arid land soils. J Soil Sediment. 2015;15(3):710-21. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s11368-015-1072-z]
28. Mahmoodabadi M, Cerdà A. WEPP calibration for improved predictions of interrill erosion in semi-arid to arid environments. Geoderma. 2013;204-205:75-83. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.04.013]
29. Bagarello V, Ferro V, Pampalone V. A new expression of the slope length factor to apply USLE-MM at Sparacia experimental area (Southern Italy). Catena. 2013;102:21-6. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.catena.2011.06.008]
30. Mahmoodabadi M, Ghadiri H, Yu B, Rose C. Morpho-dynamic quantification of flow-driven rill erosion parameters based on physical principles. J Hydrol. 2014;514:328-36. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.04.041]
31. Tingwu L, Xia W, Zhao J, Liu Z, Zhang Q. Method for measuring velocity of shallow water flow for soil erosion with an electrolyte tracer. J Hydrol. 2005;301(1-4):139-45. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.06.025]
32. Asadi H, Ghadiri H, Rose CW, Rouhipour H. Interrill soil erosion processes and their interaction on low slopes. Earth Surf Process Landf. 2007;32(5):711-24. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/esp.1426]
33. Hao Y, Yang Y, Liu B, Liu Y, Gao X, Guo Q. Size characteristics of sediments eroded from three soils in China under natural rainfall. J Soil Sediment. 2016;16(8):2153-65. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s11368-016-1424-3]
34. Zhang GH, Liu YM, Han YF, Zhang XC. Sediment transport and soil detachment on steep slopes: I. Transport capacity estimation. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2009;73(4):1291-7.
https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2008.0145 [Link] [DOI:10.2136/sssaj2009.0074]
35. An SS, Darboux F, Cheng M. Revegetation as an efficient means of increasing soil aggregate stability on the Loess Plateau (China). Geoderma. 2013;209-210:75-85. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.05.020]
36. Asadi H, Ghadiri H, Rose CW, Yu B, Hussein J. An investigation of flow-driven soil erosion processes at low streampowers. J Hydrol. 2007;342(1-2):134-42. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.05.019]
37. Asadi H, Moussavi A, Ghadiri H, Rose CW. Flow-driven soil erosion processes and the size selectivity of sediment. J Hydrol. 2011;406(1-2):73-81. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.06.010]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |