Volume 6, Issue 3 (2018)
ECOPERSIA 2018, 6(3): 179-186 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Parsakhoo A, Jajouzadeh M, Rezaee Motlagh A. Effect of Hydromulch Binders on Reduction of Embankment-Induced Soil Erosion and Sediment Concentration. ECOPERSIA 2018; 6 (3) :179-186
URL: http://ecopersia.modares.ac.ir/article-24-16276-en.html
URL: http://ecopersia.modares.ac.ir/article-24-16276-en.html
1- Forestry Department, Forest Science Faculty, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences & Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran , aidinparsakhoo@yahoo.com
2- Silviculture & Forest Ecology Department, Forest Science Faculty, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences & Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran
3- Forestry Department, Forest Science Faculty, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences & Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran
2- Silviculture & Forest Ecology Department, Forest Science Faculty, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences & Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran
3- Forestry Department, Forest Science Faculty, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences & Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran
Abstract: (6246 Views)
Aims: Hydromulching treatments are increasingly being used as a feasible alternative of landscape management for runoff and soil erosion control after road construction. Towards this, the present study aimed at evaluating the effect of hydromulch binders on reduction of embankment-induced soil erosion and sediment concentration.
Materials & Methods: This experimental study was conducted in Golestan Province, Iran in March 2017. Two types of soil stabilizers were used. Hydromulch A included water absorbent, Festuca arundinacea L. seed, tackifier, fertilizer, and bio humus. Hydromulch B was combined from hydromulch A, cellulose fiber, and natural yarn. Then, the hydromulches as well as the non-hydromulch traditional mix (seed and animal fertilizer) were separately sprayed on artificial bare slopes. Treated soil were translocated and established in the specific boxes for measuring grass biomass, sediment concentration, runoff, and soil erosion under the rainfall simulation. The data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Duncan multiple comparison tests.
Findings: Hydromulch A and traditional mix produced lower value of the total biomass of grass compared with hydromulch B. Hydromulch B yielded significantly less runoff volumes than the other treatments. Only the hydromulch B significantly reduced soil erosion compared with that of the hydromulch A and traditional mix (p<0.05).
Conclusion: Hydromulch B is clearly much more efficient than hydromulch A and traditional seeding in terms of minimizing soil erosion. Traditional mix seeding is not able to promote an effective grass cover to reduce soil erosion from artificial slopes. Hydromulch B provide favorable moisture and soil temperatures for grass seeds and this accelerates plant establishment.
Materials & Methods: This experimental study was conducted in Golestan Province, Iran in March 2017. Two types of soil stabilizers were used. Hydromulch A included water absorbent, Festuca arundinacea L. seed, tackifier, fertilizer, and bio humus. Hydromulch B was combined from hydromulch A, cellulose fiber, and natural yarn. Then, the hydromulches as well as the non-hydromulch traditional mix (seed and animal fertilizer) were separately sprayed on artificial bare slopes. Treated soil were translocated and established in the specific boxes for measuring grass biomass, sediment concentration, runoff, and soil erosion under the rainfall simulation. The data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Duncan multiple comparison tests.
Findings: Hydromulch A and traditional mix produced lower value of the total biomass of grass compared with hydromulch B. Hydromulch B yielded significantly less runoff volumes than the other treatments. Only the hydromulch B significantly reduced soil erosion compared with that of the hydromulch A and traditional mix (p<0.05).
Conclusion: Hydromulch B is clearly much more efficient than hydromulch A and traditional seeding in terms of minimizing soil erosion. Traditional mix seeding is not able to promote an effective grass cover to reduce soil erosion from artificial slopes. Hydromulch B provide favorable moisture and soil temperatures for grass seeds and this accelerates plant establishment.
Article Type: مقاله Ø§Ø³ØªØ®Ø±Ø§Ø Ø´Ø¯Ù‡ از پایان نامه |
Subject:
Aquatic Ecology
Received: 2018/03/3 | Accepted: 2018/07/17 | Published: 2018/08/25
Received: 2018/03/3 | Accepted: 2018/07/17 | Published: 2018/08/25
References
1. Sheldon JC, Bradshaw AD. The development of a hydraulic seeding technique for unstable sand slopes. I. Effects of fertilizers, mulches and stabilizers. J Appl Ecol. 1997; 14(3):905-18. [Link] [DOI:10.2307/2402821]
2. Grace JM. Effectiveness of vegetation in erosion control from forest road sideslopes. Trans ASAE. 2002;45(3):681-5. [Link]
3. Liu G, Tian FX, Warrington DN, Zheng SQ, Zhang Q. Efficacy of grass for mitigating runoff and erosion from an artificial loessial earthen road. American Soci Agri Biol Eng. 2010;53(1):119-25. [Link]
4. Adekalu KO, Olorunfemi IA, Osunbitan JA. Grass mulching effect on infiltration, surface runoff and soil loss of three agricultural soils in Nigeria. Bioresour Technol. 2007;98(4):912-7. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2006.02.044]
5. Albaladejo Montoro J, Alvarez Rogel J, Querejeta J, Díaz E, Castillo V. Three hydro-seeding revegetation techniques for soil erosion control on anthropic steep slopes. Land Degrad Dev. 2000;11(4):315-25.
https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-145X(200007/08)11:4<315::AID-LDR394>3.0.CO;2-4 [Link] [DOI:10.1002/1099-145X(200007/08)11:43.0.CO;2-4]
6. Groen AH, Woods SW. Effectiveness of aerial seeding and straw mulch for reducing post-wildfire erosion, north-western Montana, USA. Int J Wildland Fire. 2008;17(5):559-71. [Link] [DOI:10.1071/WF07062]
7. Bautista S, Robichaud PR, Bladé C. Post-fire mulching. In: Cerdá A, Robichaud PR. editors. Fire effects on soils and restoration strategies. Volume 5. New Hampshire: Science Publishers; 2009. pp. 353-72. [Link] [DOI:10.1201/9781439843338-c13]
8. Faucette LB, Risse LM, Nearing MA, Gaskin JW, West LT. Runoff, erosion, and nutrient losses from compost and mulch blankets under simulated rainfall. J Soil Water Conserv. 2004;59(4):154-60. [Link]
9. Akbarzadeh A, Taghizadeh Mehrjardi R, Refahi HG, Rouhipour H, Gorji M. Using soil binders to control runoff and soil loss in steep slopes under simulated rainfall. Int Agrophysics. 2009;23(2):99-109. [Link]
10. Dodson EK, Peterson DW. Seeding and fertilization effects on plant cover and community recovery following wildfire in the Eastern Cascade Mountains, USA. For Ecol Manage. 2009;258:1586-93. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2009.07.013]
11. Enriquez A, Carrasco MJ, Varela JM. Monitoring the effectiveness of plant restoration of the slopes of the highways. Civil. 2004;134:27-35. [Link]
12. Marques MJ, Bienes R, Jiménez L, Pérez-Rodríguez R. Effect of vegetal cover on runoff and soil erosion under light intensity events. Rainfall simulation over USLE plots. Sci Total Environ. 2007;378(1-2):161-5. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.01.043]
13. Rivera D, Mejías V, Jáuregui BM, Costa-Tenorio M, López-Archilla AI, Peco B. Spreading topsoil encourages ecological restoration on embankments: Soil fertility, microbial activity and vegetation cover. PLOS ONE. 2014;9(7):101-14. [Link] [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0101413]
14. Li XH, Zhang ZY, Yang J, Zhang GH, Wang B. Effects of Bahia grass cover and mulch on runoff and sediment yield of sloping red soil in southern China. Pedosphere. 2011;21(2):238-43. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S1002-0160(11)60123-9]
15. Gyasi-Agyei Y. Optimum use of erosion control blankets and waste ballast (rock) mulch to aid grass establishment on steep slopes. J Hydro Eng. 2004;9(2):150-9. [Link] [DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2004)9:2(150)]
16. Fox JL, Bhattarai SP, Gyasi- Agyei Y. Evaluation of different seed mixtures for grass establishment to mitigate soil erosion on steep slopes of railway batters. J Irrig Drain Eng. 2010;137(9):624-31. [Link] [DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000319]
17. Pan C, Shangguan Z. Runoff hydraulic characteristics and sediment generation in sloped grassplots under simulated rainfall conditions. J Hydrol. 2006;331(1-2):178-85. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.05.011]
18. Babcock DL, McLaughlin RA. Runoff water quality and vegetative establishment for groundcovers on steep slopes. J Soil Water Conserv. 2011;66(2):132-41. [Link] [DOI:10.2489/jswc.66.2.132]
19. Holt G, Buser M, Harmel D, Potter K, Pelletier M. Comparison of cotton based hydro-mulches and conventional wood and paper hydro-mulches-study ॥. J Cotton Sci. 2005;9(3):121-7. [Link]
20. Babcock DL, McLaughlin RA. Erosion control effectiveness of straw, hydromulch and polyacrylamide in a rainfall simulator. J Soil Water Conserv. 2013;68(3):221-7. [Link] [DOI:10.2489/jswc.68.3.221]
21. Baskin JM, Davis BH, Baskin CC, Gleason SM, Cordell S. Physical dormancy in seeds of Dodonaea viscosa (Sapindales, Sapindaceae) from Hawaii. Seed Sci Res. 2004;14(1):81-90. [Link] [DOI:10.1079/SSR2003157]
22. Phartyal SS, Baskin JM, Baskin CC, Thapliyal RC. Physical dormancy in seeds of Dodonaea viscosa (Sapindaceae) from India. Seed Sci Res. 2005;15(1):59-61. [Link] [DOI:10.1079/SSR2004194]
23. Hossain MA, Arefin MK, Baldip Khan, Rahman MA. Effects of seed treatments on germination and seedling growth attributes of Horitaki (Terminalia chebula Retz.) in the nursery. Res J Agric Biol Sci. 2005;1(2):135-41. [Link]
24. Karaguzel O, Cakmakci S, Ortacesme V, Aydınoğlu B. Influence of seed coat treatments on germination and early seedling growth of Lupinus varius L. Pak J Bot. 2004;36(1):65-74. [Link]
25. Li L, Xi-ming Z, Runge M, Xiao-ming L, Xing-yuan H. Responses of germination and radicle growth of two Populus species to water potential and salinity. For Stud China. 2006; 8(1): 10-5. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s11632-006-0002-y]
26. Mickovski SB, Van Beek LPH. Root morphology and effects on soil reinforcement and slope stability of young vetiver (Vetiveria zizanioides) plants grown in semi-arid climate. Plant Soil. 2009;324(1-2):43-56. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s11104-009-0130-y]
27. Gobinath R, Ganapathy GP, Akinwumi II. Evaluating the use of lemon grass roots for the reinforcement of a landslide affected soil from Nilgris district, Tamil Nadu, India. J Mater Environ Sci. 2015;6(10):2681-8. [Link]
28. Berglund ER. Seeding to control erosion along forest roads. Corvallis: Extension Service, Oregon State University; 1976. p. 20. [Link]
29. Coleman R. The case for planting native grasses and wildflowers. Public Works, 1996;127:54-83. [Link]
30. Landis TD, Wilkinson KM, Steinfeld DE, Riley SA, Fekaris GN. Roadside revegetation of forest highways: New applications for native plants. Nativ Plant. 2005;6(3):297-305. [Link] [DOI:10.2979/NPJ.2005.6.3.297]
31. Vega JA, Fernández C, Fonturbel T. Comparing the effectiveness of seeding and mulching + seeding in reducing soil erosion after a high severity fire in Galicia (NW Spain). Ecol Eng. 2015;74:206-12. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.10.019]
32. Hubbert KR, Wohlgemuth PM, Beyers JL. Effects of hydromulch on post-fire erosion and plant recovery in chaparral shrublands of southern California. Int J Wildland Fire. 2012;21:155-67. [Link] [DOI:10.1071/WF10050]
33. Clemente AS, Moedas AR, Oliveira G. Martins-Loução M.A. Correia O. Effect of hydroseeding components on the germination of Mediterranean native plant species. J Arid Environ. 2016;125:68-72. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2015.09.017]
34. Vourlitis Gl, Griganavicius J, Gordon N, Bloomer K, Grant T, Hentz C. Hydroseeding increases ecosystem nitrogen retention but inhibits natural vegetation regeneration after two years of chaparral post-fire recovery. Ecol Eng. 2017;102:46-54. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.01.041]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |